Page 35 - IJPS-2-1
P. 35

Bruno Yempabou Lankoande

                             the time of the survey or at the time of death is used to assess the gap in mortality. In women, esti-
                             mates obtained by using children’s place of residence yielded an urban advantage. This advantage
                             was reinforced when parent’s place of residence were taken into account.
                                These results suggest that information on children’s place of residence is not a good proxy for
                             their parents’ place of residence. In addition, misclassification errors seem to operate differentially
                             according to the sex. Nevertheless, even if urban areas benefit from a slight advantage, this differ-
                             ence is not significant at the 0.05 level, because confidence intervals considerably overlap in each
                             period.
                             3.3 Sibling Survival Histories

                             Estimates of adult mortality based on sibling histories are presented in Figure 3 for both types of
                             residence. The dating procedure is more precise here (compared to orphanhood estimates) and the
                             availability of three surveys provides a rough idea on the trend in mortality. On the one hand, adult
                             mortality rates have decreased since 1990s to 2000s in urban areas. This mortality decline was more
                             marked among men. On the other hand, rural areas experience stalls, sometimes reversals, in adult
                             mortality. Rural areas tend to have an advantage in terms of adult mortality that fades over time. In
                             the period of 1992–1997, for men as well as women, the value of  45q 15 in urban areas was around 0.4
                             while this value was less than 0.3 in rural areas. An inverse situation was observed in the period of
                             2004–2009,  with higher  mortality in rural areas. However, for each  period,  confidence intervals
                             largely overlap, indicating that DHS sample sizes are too small to detect any significant difference.
                             Again, I should reiterate that the place of residence of interviewed women was used as a proxy for
                             their sibling’s place of residence.
                                To assess the quality of sibling survival histories in the different DHS, Figure 4 shows the mean
                             number of siblings reported by the five-year age group of respondents. This number is the average
                             parity of the respondents’ mother; it should be closed to the completed fertility in Burkina Faso, and
                             should increase with the respondents’ age since fertility has declined in recent decades. Two major
                             observations  stand out from these plots. First, the  average  parity is globally higher  in  urban
































       Figure 3. Estimates of adult mortality with 95% confidence interval, by sex and according to place of residence based on siblings survival data from
       1992 to 2009 (DHS data).

                                     International Journal of Population Studies | 2016, Volume 2, Issue 1      29
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40