Page 23 - IJPS-4-1
P. 23

Xiaorong Gu


               Table 2. Tempo of transition to first marriage, by birth cohort, gender, and hukou origin (weighted).
               Birth cohort       Mean age                            By age 30: % married
                                                All     Rural female   Rural male    Urban female   Urban male
               1946–1955         24.06 (0.07)  93%       0.98 (0.00)    0.92 (0.01)   0.96 (0.01)   0.86 (0.01)
               1956–1965         23.74 (0.05)  96%       0.99 (0.00)    0.96 (0.01)   0.98 (0.00)   0.92 (0.01)
               1966–1975         23.51 (0.05)  95%       0.98 (0.00)    0.94 (0.01)   0.97 (0.00)   0.90 (0.01)
               1976–1985         24.38 (0.06)  95%       0.99 (0.00)    0.95 (0.01)   0.97 (0.01)   0.90 (0.01)


               Table 3. Cox hazard ratio for age of first marriage.
                                                            Model 1            Model 2             Model 3
               Demographic characteristics
               Birth cohort (ref.=1976–1985)
                1946–1955                                 0.79(0.02)***        0.83(0.02)***      0.83(0.02)***
                1956–1965                                 0.97(0.02)           0.97(0.02)         0.97(0.02)
                1966–1975                                 0.99(0.02)           0.92(0.02)***      0.92(0.02)***
               Male (1=yes)                               0.66(0.02)***        0.64(0.02)***      0.62(0.02)***
               Han ethnicity (1=yes)                      0.94(0.03)           1.03(0.03)         1.03(0.03)
               Data wave (ref.=2012 wave)
                2013 wave                                 0.97(0.02)*          0.96(0.01)*        0.96(0.01)*
                2015 wave                                 1.00(0.02)           0.97(0.02)         0.97(0.02)
               Educational attainment (ref.=primary school and less)
                Middle school                             0.72(0.01)***        0.87(0.02)***      0.87(0.02)***
                Junior college and more                   0.47(0.01)***        0.68(0.03)***      0.68(0.03)***
               Family background
                Urban hukou (1=yes)                                            0.79(0.02)***      0.75(0.02)***
               Father’s education (ref.=primary school )
                Junior middle school                                           0.97(0.02)**       0.97(0.02)**
                High school and more                                           0.96(0.02)***      0.96(0.02)***
               Father’s employment status (ref.=farming)
                Full-time employed                                             0.94(0.02)**       0.94(0.02)**
                Others                                                         0.89(0.02)***      0.89(0.02)***
               Regional location (ref.=east)
                Central                                                        1.21(0.02)***      1.21(0.02)***
                West                                                           1.25(0.02)***      1.26(0.02)***
                Northeast                                                      1.34(0.03)***      1.34(0.03)***
               Interaction effect
                Male*urban hukou                                                                  1.10(0.03)***
                Log-likelihood                            −1,83,120.69        −1,72,560.12       −1,28,922.61
                Observations                                18,984              18,984             18,984
              Note: The complete-case analysis shown here is based on a sample after list-wise deletion of missing data on family background variables. *p<0.05. **p<0.01. ***p<0.001

              in first marriage age for respondents due to longer time spent in high education is compensated by their expedited transition to
              marriage within in very short window: 34% of youths get married 3 years after college and another 28% in 5 years after.
                 Table 3 presents the estimates of the Cox hazard ratios for the age of first marriage in a stepwise analysis. Model 1
              estimates hazard ratios by including birth cohort, educational attainment, and demographic controls. Model 2 adds family


              International Journal of Population Studies | 2018, Volume 4, Issue 1                          17
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28