Page 21 - IJPS-4-1
P. 21

Xiaorong Gu


               Table 1. Weighted summary statistics (sample: Aged 22 or above).
               Variables                    All respondents                   By hukou and gender
                                           n        Mean     Rural female  Rural male  Urban female  Urban male
               Age                       27,887   46.9 (0.09)  46.8 (0.16)  47.4 (0.17)  46.7 (0.21)  46.4 (0.21)
               Ethnicity (Han=1)         27,854   0.92 (0.00)  0.90 (0.00)  0.91 (0.00)  0.94 (0.00)   0.95 (0.00)
               Birth cohort              27,887
                1946–1955                6,274    0.25 (0.00)  0.24 (0.01)  0.27 (0.01)  0.25 (0.01)  0.25 (0.01)
                1956–1965                6,629    0.25 (0.00)  0.25 (0.01)  0.24 (0.01)  0.25 (0.01)  0.27 (0.01)
                1966–1975                7,182    0.24 (0.00)   0.27 (0.01)  0.25 (0.01)   0.22 (0.01)  0.20 (0.01)
                1976–1993                7,802    0.26 (0.00)  0.25 (0.01)  0.24 (0.01)  0.27 (0.01)  0.29 (0.01)
               Education                 27,862
                ≤Primary                 9,060    0.33 (0.00)  0.56 (0.01)  0.39 (0.01)  0.13 (0.00)  0.09 (0.00)
                Middle-high school       14,075   0.49 (0.00)  0.38 (0.01)  0.54 (0.01)  0.55 (0.01)  0.54 (0.01)
                ≥College                 4,727    0.18 (0.00)  0.06 (0.00)  0.07 (0.00)  0.32 (0.01)  0.37 (0.01)
                Years of schooling       27,862   9.18 (0.03)  5.55 (0.06)  8.23 (0.05)  11.36 (0.06)  12.02 (0.06)
               Family SES
                Urban hukou              27,871   0.41 (0.00)    0           0            1            1
               Father’s education        26,590
                ≤Primary                 18,867   0.71 (0.00)  0.81 (0.01)  0.82 (0.01)  0.56 (0.01)  0.56 (0.01)
                Junior middle            4,294    0.16 (0.00)  0.13 (0.00)  0.12 (0.01)  0.20 (0.01)  0.20 (0.01)
                ≥High school             3,429    0.13 (0.00)  0.06 (0.00)  0.06 (0.00)  0.24 (0.01)  0.24 (0.01)
               Father’s employment status  27,468
                Full-time                8,730    0.33 (0.00)  0.14 (0.00)  0.14 (0.00)  0.62 (0.01)  0.61 (0.01)
                Farming                  15,172   0.53 (0.00)  0.74 (0.01)  0.74 (0.01)  0.23 (0.01)  0.24 (0.01)
                Others                   3,566    0.13 (0.00)  0.12 (0.00)  0.12 (0.00)  0.15 (0.01)  0.15 (0.01)
               Region
                East                     10,583   0.38 (0.00)  0.29 (0.01)  0.28 (0.01)  0.52 (0.01)  0.51 (0.01)
                Central                  6,412    0.23 (0.00)  0.29 (0.01)  0.27 (0.01)  0.16 (0.01)  0.17 (0.01)
                West                     6,692    0.24 (0.00)  0.30 (0.01)  0.32 (0.01)  0.14 (0.01)  0.15 (0.01)
                Northeast                4,200    0.15 (0.00)  0.13 (0.00)  0.13 (0.00)  0.18 (0.01)  0.17 (0.01)
               Survey year
                2012 wave                9,760    0.34 (0.00)  0.33 (0.01)  0.33 (0.01)  0.36 (0.01)  0.36 (0.01)
                2013 wave                9,202    0.33 (0.00)  0.33 (0.01)  0.33 (0.01)  0.34 (0.01)  0.34 (0.01)
                2015 wave                8,925    0.32 (0.00)  0.34 (0.01)  0.34 (0.01)  0.30 (0.01)  0.29 (0.01)


              by birth cohort, we see that gender gaps in both rural and urban contexts are increasingly narrowed (results not shown).
              For example, in the earliest cohort (1946–1955), the gap in average years of education between rural females and rural
              males is about 2.6 years (3.5 vs. 6.08) and between urban females and urban males is 1.3 years (8.76 vs. 10.08). Among
              the youngest cohort (1976–1993), the gaps are 0.75 and 0.12 years in rural and urban groups, respectively. Despite the
              narrowing gender gap in years of schooling, large gaps exist between rural and urban respondents’ college attendance rates:
              About 20% of rural men and women received at least college education, while almost 70% of their urban counterparts
              were college graduates.
                 Family background indicators also exhibit pronounced urban-rural divides, due to the deep-entrenched hukou system.
              Regarding father’s education, about 80% of rural respondents’ fathers only attended primary school or less, a rate 25%
              higher than their urban counterparts did; the chances of rural respondents’ fathers having high school or more education
              are merely one-fourth of those of their urban counterparts (6% vs. 24%). Regarding father’s employment status when the


              International Journal of Population Studies | 2018, Volume 4, Issue 1                          15
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26