Page 53 - IJPS-5-1
P. 53

Mirembe, et al.

              had a significant association with employment status of the migrant. As regard to self-employed youths in the country,
              self-employed youths spend most of their time working in their own small scale business and they are largely engaged in
              petty businesses such as operating chapatti stalls, retail shops, restaurants, mobile money outlets, saloons, bars, boutiques,
              artisanry, motorcycle cyclists, selling narcotic drugs, market stalls, petty trade, bricklaying, building and construction,
              mechanical repair, maintenance and food processing, and operating taxi vehicles (Magelah and Ntambirweki-Karugonjo,
              2014). Given the fact that there are limited jobs in the country, self-employment is actually the dream of each and every
              youth in the country. The various advantages attached to it, that is, independence, control, and freedom from routine make
              it the most preferable employment status among the youths. In other words, the youth is able to decide when, where and
              how to work (Goldin, Hobson, Glick et al., 2015)).
                 Employed status is a situation in which a youth is engaged or hired into a service with an intention of being paid at
              the end of either a day, a week, or a month (Shamchiyeva, 2017). The study results revealed that age, residence, number
              of children, region, fuel used for cooking, and social networks did not have any association with employed status while
              sex, marital status, highest education level, and reasons for migration had an association with the possibility of a migrant
              youth being employed. In Uganda, most of the male youths are employed in activities such as mechanics, welding, mobile
              money, and carpentry and most female youths are employed in activities such as hair dressing, shop attendants, and
              mobile money businesses. However, most of the youths take on employed status as a means of surviving and as well be
              able to raise capital to start up their own businesses (Shamchiyeva, 2017).
                 In the study, reasons for migration were subdivided into social, economic, and forced reasons. Results of the study
              revealed that reasons for migration have a significant association with self-employment status and employed status.
              With self-employment status, the relative risk of a youth being self-employed over one who was unemployed was lower
              for a youth who migrated due to social reasons relative to a youth who migrated due to economic reasons. On the other
              hand, the relative risk of a youth being employed over a youth who was unemployed was also lower for a youth who had
              migrated due to social reasons relative to a youth who had migrated due to economic reasons. Results of the study are in
              agreement with a study conducted by United Nations (2011) in developing countries which also suggested that there was
              a significant association between reasons for migration and employment status because youths usually leave their places
              of origin to new destination areas where they believe they can easily access employment to stabilize their income as well
              as have a stronger and greater engagement in the society (United Nations, 2011).

              5. Policy Implications
              Our findings have important policy implications. Local governments should include the needs of the youths, especially
              those aged 33-35 years because they have almost three more odds to be migrants as compared to youths aged 18-22 years.
              This could be done through infrastructural development and provision of social services and amenities (such as electricity,
              improvement and construction of new education facilities, improve health-care delivery, safe water, tightening of security,
              and upgrading of local markets) to their local communities so as to encourage the youths to stay and carry out economic
              activities in their places of origin other than moving away to the nearby urban areas which are already worsened with
              effects of unplanned urbanization.
                 With the region having a strong association with migration status, informal settlement evictions should be ended. Many
              rural to urban migrants live in informal settlements and face intense disruptions to both their home life and livelihoods
              through the threat of eviction. There should be increase in the capacity of state and nonstate stakeholders to upgrade
              informal settlements and orientate urban planning that supports access to basic services and affordable housing.
                 There is also a need to overcome the problem of regional imbalance which is one of the causes of migration. To do
              this, governments should work in hand with the private sector to improve service delivery, create more employment
              opportunities and redistribute tax revenues so that poorer localities can have the capacity to provide adequate local public
              services hence leading to equitable growth in the country.
                 While we stressed the strengths of our study, the study has some limitations. For example, some information about
              nonmigrants was not available, such as socioeconomic status of the migrant’s place of origin/sending household, living
              conditions, wages, which made the dataset rather lacking on some variables which would otherwise have enriched the study.
              Age was also a limitation because it is usually affected by social desirability bias, cultural, and other issues in the country.
              6. Conclusions

              The study has provided insights about associates of migration status and migrant employment status. Further research is
              needed to assess reasons for migration with other individual or household level factors.


              International Journal of Population Studies | 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1                          47
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58