Page 61 - IJPS-9-2
P. 61

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                                Personality traits in homosexual men in Iran





























            Figure 2. Pair-wise comparison of men with different sex roles in terms of the clinical scales of MMPI-2 in Homosexual men, Iran. Notes: Hypochondriasis
            (Hs), depression (D), hysteria (Hy), psychopathic deviate (Pd), paranoia (Pa), psychasthenia (Pt), schizophrenia (Sc), and hypomania (Ma).

            Iranian homosexual men and their heterosexual counterparts.   a  patriarchal  and  traditional  community,  homosexual
            Homosexual men scored higher on various scales, including   men are condemned for and denied their feminine
            infrequency (F), correction (K), hysteria (Hs), depression   characteristics. This is because they internalize all
            (D), hypochondria (Hy), paranoia (Pa), and psychasthenia   masculinity criteria, originated from fully heteronormative
            (Pt). Homosexual men had the highest mean across all scales.   rules, and identify themselves accordingly; rules by which
            Furthermore, differences were observed between the bottom   men must be stronger, tougher, more successful, and more
            and versatile homosexual men compared to heterosexual   competitive.
            men on correction (K). In addition, differences were found   Accordingly, higher scores of the tops group compared
            between the top and bottom homosexual men compared to   to the versatile group are because top homosexual men
            heterosexual men on paranoia (Pa). It is worth noting that   show their shame of being stigmatized for gender non-
            the bottom homosexual men had the highest mean score   conformity through internalized homophobia and
            on correction (K), while the top homosexual men had the   unwillingness to self-identify as homosexuals, to conform
            highest mean on paranoia (Pa).                     further to masculine gender norms in this patriarchal

              Higher scores of top and versatile groups in infrequency   culture. At the same time, the more uncomfortable a
            (F) indicate confusion and low self-esteem in members of   homosexual men is with his orientation, the greater his
            these  groups.  In  other  words,  they  evaluate  themselves   level of anxiety in social interactions would be. On the
            as less efficient than they actually are. They also suffer   contrary, since versatile gays show more conformity to
            from high degrees of anger and anxiety. This result was   feminine and masculine gender norms, they respond
            consistent with the findings of Pachankis & Goldfried   better to their community’s demands (Hart  et al., 2003;
            (2006), indicating that homosexual men had more social   Pachankis & Goldfried, 2006).
            anxiety symptoms (e.g., fear of negative evaluation and   Higher scores of the bottoms and versatile groups in
            social  turmoil)  than  their  heterosexual  counterparts,   correction (K) indicate high resistance and control, along
            particularly when they face male behavioral stereotypes.  with unawareness and one-dimensionality of these men.
              According to Zheng et al. (2012), Swift-Gallant et  al.   Members of these two groups have several problems in
            (2018), and Besharat  et al. (2016), homosexual men   social relationships and mutual interaction with each other.
            show more gender non-conformity in comparison with   Heckhausen et al. (2010), Nussbaum & Dweck (2008), and
            their heterosexual counterparts during childhood and   Ungerleider & Ungerleider (2019) found that correction is
            adulthood, meaning that they exhibit more abnormal   the other side of the “blame” coin. That is, the person tries
            gender behaviors. This gender nonconformity is less   to claim, “It was not my fault; it was someone else’s fault.”
            noticeable in tops while being more visible in bottom and   This approach is often seen in communities with a system
            versatile gays. Eslen-Ziya & Koç (2016) ascertain that in   of criticism and punishment.


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         55                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.0390
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66