Page 87 - IJPS-9-2
P. 87

International Journal of
            Population Studies                                             Development service in East Malaysia Suburban




            Table 2. Socioeconomic development service gaps (Batu Kawa, Sarawak)
             Dimensions                   Performance (1‑5)             Importance (1‑5)        Gaps     Gaps
                                       n =124        n =159          n =124        n =159        n 1      n 2
                                                                      1
                                                                                    2
                                       1
                                                      2
                                    Mean   S.D.   Mean    S.D.    Mean   S.D.   Mean    S.D.
            Nature                  3.64    0.824  3.59   0.870   4.10   0.866   3.98   0.833   0.46*    0.39*
            Culture                 3.65    0.763  3.59   0.870   4.04   0.850   3.92   0.821   0.39*    0.33*
            Education               3.74    0.791  3.69   0.767   4.25   0.849   4.11   0.896   0.51*    0.42*
            Health                  3.64   0.837   3.64   0.847   4.25   0.839   4.17   0.883   0.61*    0.53*
            Safety and security     3.32   0.985   3.39   0.992   4.27   0.894   4.09   0.970   0.95*    0.70*
            Sports and recreation   3.40   0.927   3.31   0.933   4.02   0.926   3.93   0.882   0.62*    0.62*
            Transport and logistics  3.33  0.916   3.29   0.963   4.14   0.820   3.94   0.926   0.81*    0.65*
            Infrastructure and amenities  3.48  0.869  3.47  0.874  4.21  0.826  3.94   0.986   0.73*    0.47*
            Economy                 3.51   0.914   3.52   0.805   4.27   0.816   3.97   0.947   0.76*    0.45*
            Sustainability          3.55   0.894   3.55   0.851   4.23   0.854   4.00   0.971   0.68*    0.45*
            Note: Performance: 1=Very poor, 2=Poor, 3=Moderate, 4=Good, 5=Excellent; Importance: 1=Very unimportant, 2=Unimportant, 3=Neutral,
            4=Important, 5=Very important; The gap is the mean difference between importance and performance (i.e., importance – performance); *All the gaps
            are significant at 5% level of significance. The bold values indicate the relatively wider gaps.

            Table 3. Significance of the gaps and difference between two regions (by river), Malaysia, 2021
             Dimensions               n =124          n 159        Before the river  After the river  t   Sig.
                                       1               2=
                                   Gaps     t      Gaps     t
            Nature                 0.46*   6.470   0.39*   5.259       3.50            3.45       0.524  0.600
            Culture                0.39*   5.651   0.33*   4.036       3.56            3.46       1.116  0.266
            Education              0.51*   6.395   0.42*   5.291       3.70*           3.49       2.037  0.043
            Health                 0.61*   7.912   0.53*   6.718       3.89*           3.50       4.014  0.000
            Safety and security    0.95*   8.897   0.70*   7.498       3.36            3.28       0.706  0.480
            Sports and recreation  0.62*   6.748   0.62*   6.906       3.33            3.19       1.194  0.234
            Transport and logistics  0.81*  7.848  0.65*   6.767       3.12            3.04       0.744  0.457
            Infrastructure and amenities  0.73*  8.155  0.47*  5.333   3.65*           3.33       3.549  0.000
            Economy                0.76*   8.814   0.45*   5.885       3.44*           3.19       2.736  0.007
            Sustainability         0.68*   7.951   0.45*   5.877       3.44            3.30       1.438  0.152
            Overall                                                    3.48**          3.33       1.851  0.065
            Note: *Significant at 5%; **Significant at 10%. The bold values indicate the relatively wider gaps.

            is consistent with a study by Dang  et al. (2020)’s that   generally more satisfied (significant at 10%) with the
            education  and health-care  facilities  are critical factors   socioeconomic development service provided (Table 3).
            influencing residents’ life satisfaction and happiness   The  differences  are significant (level of  significance
            perceptions. Nevertheless, the quality of education and   of 5%) for “education,” “health,” “infrastructure, and
            facilities should be continuously emphasized. “Culture”   basic amenities” as well as “economy” dimensions.
            is also important, rated as the second highest in its   The Sarawak River which divides Batu Kawa into
            performance score.                                 two geographical parts, especially before the Datuk
              Further  investigation  was  done  to  understand   Chong Kiun Kong Bridge was built in the early 1990s,
            the experience and expectations of the suburban    causes much inconvenience in logistical and human
            population. The mean analysis was done between the   capital mobility hence the difference in socioeconomic
            residents staying before the river and after the river   development and the related service provision.
            (if coming from the Kuching City). The residents     The suburban socioeconomic development ideally
            staying before the river, nearer to the Kuching City, are   should be comprehensive and the geographical distribution


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                         81                         https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.442
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92