Page 100 - ITPS-8-1
P. 100

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                            BDNF-AS biomarker in multiple sclerosis



            3. Results

            3.1. Demographics and disease characteristics in MS              EDSS a  3.05±2.74  6.00±1.02  5.55±1.14  -  -
            subjects
            When comparing age and sex across the disease groups
            and the control group, no differences were observed,
            indicating that all groups were age-  and sex-matched.
            Regarding family history of MS, only 2 cases (6.5%) within       Frequency of relapses b,d  2±2  4±2  -  -  -
            the RRMS group and 1  case (7.7%) within the SPMS
            group reported a family history of the disease. The relapse/
            remitting classification within the RRMS and SPMS
            groups revealed 16 relapse RRMS cases, eight relapse
            SPMS cases, 15 remitting RRMS cases, and five remitting
            SPMS cases. The number of relapses within the past 3 years       MS duration a  5.11±4.65  15.12±8.66  10.8±9.9  -  -
            (median ± interquartile range) was 2 ± 2 for RRMS and 4
            ± 2 for SPMS. The mean ± standard deviation of the EDSS
            scores were 3.05 ± 2.74 for RRMS, 6.00 ± 1.02 for SPMS,
            and 5.55 ± 1.14 for PPMS. The demographic and clinical
            characteristics of all included subjects and controls are           Remitting (%)  15 (48.4)  5 (38.5)  -  -  -
            summarized in Table 1.

            3.2. Evaluation of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate                    Status c
            dehydrogenase as a suitable reference gene
            The suitability of  GAPDH as a reference control gene               Relapse (%)  16 (51.6)  8 (61.5)  -  -  -
            was assessed by examining the average Ct across all MS
            patients and healthy control volunteers. The mean Ct
            values (± standard error [S.E.]) for  GAPDH were as                 No (%)  29 (93.6)  12 (92.3)  10 (100)  20 (100)  - Notes:  a Mean±standard deviation;  b Median±interquartile range;  c Frequency;  d Within the last 3 years. Abbreviations: EDSS: Expanded disability status scale; MS: Multiple sclerosis; PPMS: Primary
            follows:  25.97  ±  0.058  for  control  samples,  23.69  ±  0.78
            for PPMS, 24.59 ± 0.34 for RRMS-relapse, 24.58 ± 0.37            Family history c
            for RRMS-remitting, 25.03 ± 0.74 for SPMS-relapse, and              Yes (%)  2 (6.5)  1 (7.7)  0 (0)  0 (0)  -
            27.36 ± 0.49 for SPMS-remitting. The normality of the data
            was confirmed using the non-parametric Shapiro–Wilk
            and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests, with P = 0.153 and 0.200,
            respectively. A  parametric one-way analysis of variance            Female (%)  18 (58)  7 (54)  6 (60)  11 (55)
            was conducted to examine differences in the Ct values            Gender c         0.883
            of  GAPDH across all groups, revealing no statistically                               progressive multiple sclerosis; RRMS: Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS: Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.
            significant differences (P  = 0.068). These findings                Male (%)  13 (42)  6 (46)  4 (40)  9 (45)
            are illustrated in Figure 1, which shows the expression of   Table 1. Disease characteristics and demographics of multiple sclerosis subjects and controls
            GAPDH in all MS patient groups and healthy controls.

            3.3. Relative expression of BDNF-AS
            The lncRNA  BDNF-AS was found to be significantly                Age at onset a  25.68±7.54  31.23±7.67  34.30±4.16  -  -
            downregulated  (P  <  0.01) in  MS  patients compared to
            control subjects. The fold change relative to the control
            (mean ± S.E) was 0.19 ± 0.06 for PPMS, 0.33 ± 0.07 for
            RRMS-relapse, 0.30 ± 0.08 for RRMS-remitting, 0.33 ±             Age a  31.10±9.04  46.38±9.49  45.10±10.49  37.70±16.84  0.382
            0.11 for SPMS-relapse, and 0.83 ± 0.20 for SPMS-remitting.
            Multiple  comparison  tests  revealed  that  all  groups  were
            significantly different from the control, except for the
            SPMS-remitting  group,  which  showed  no  significant                 RRMS (n=31)  PPMS (n=10)  Control (n=20)
            difference  from  the  controls  and  exhibited  the  highest    Group   SPMS (n=13)  P-value
            expression among all groups. However, there were no


            Volume 8 Issue 1 (2025)                         94                               doi: 10.36922/itps.4407
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105