Page 71 - ITPS-8-1
P. 71

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                           Bibliometric skills of pharma postgraduates



               instructor-led cloud classroom learning and online   Notably, Levels A and B in the above proposed
               discussions. Teaching Level A will primarily rely on a   implementation may need to be shortened for shorter
               passive learning pedagogy.                      programs;  however,  the  training  provided  for  Level  C
            (2)  In Level B (familiarization), which corresponding   competencies should be retained, with an emphasis on
               to Semesters 2 and 3 of a 3-year, six-semester   achieving this level of competencies.
               postgraduate  pharmaceutical  program,  individual,
               asynchronous (non-facilitated), application-based   4.5. Assessment
               learning  exercises,  and  a  team-based  learning   Based on the BAC framework, the researchers developed
               pedagogy should  be introduced. Postgraduate    an assessment system that focuses on the quantitative
               students can join massive open online courses  and   evaluation of the participating postgraduate students. The
               study reference books independently. They will   total proposed score was 100 points, including 10 points
               conduct independent research and group discussions   (10%) for a mentor interview, 40 points (40%) for a written
               according to their teachers’ pre-determined questions   report, and 50 points (50%) for a group presentation. A total
               on the six technical steps of bibliometric analysis and   score of <60 will be recorded as FAILED; 60 – 69 will be
               present their interpretations of these steps based on   recorded as PASS; 70 – 79 will be recorded as MODERATE;
               the materials they read in seminars. Level B can be   80 – 89 will be recorded as GOOD; 90 – 99 will be recorded
               achieved through active and constructive learning   as EXCELLENT; and 100 will be recorded as PERFECT.
               pedagogies.                                     In this case, grades of PASS and above are considered as
            (3)  At Level C (mastering), which corresponds to   passing the BAC framework training, while students who
               Semesters 4 – 6 of a 3-year, six-semester postgraduate   receive FAILED grades require additional training.
               pharmaceutical program, problem-based learning,   The specific proposed grading rules are as follows:
               small group (non-facilitated), and simulation pedagogy   (1)  Mentor interviews. The main function of the interviews
               should be introduced. Postgraduate students should be   conducted by the instructor is to examine postgraduate
               able to evaluate and critique the six technical steps of   students about their overall awareness of bibliometric
               bibliometric analysis material provided in advance by the   analysis. The mentor determines what level (A – C) the
               instructor, form small groups for self-directed learning,   postgraduate student’s cognition has achieved, with
               and use computers to conduct simulated bibliometric   0 – 2 points for not achieving Level A, 3 – 4 points
               analyses  on given research topics in  communication   for achieving Level A without achieving Level B, 5 – 7
               sessions. Postgraduate  students  can achieve Level C   points for achieving Level B without achieving Level C,
               through interactive learning (Table 3). 44         and 8 – 10 points for achieving Level C.
              The relevant elements are summarized in Table 3, based   (2)  Written report. The main content of the written report
            on the paradigm outlined in a previous study. 44      is a bibliometric analysis of a postgraduate student’s
            Table 3. Implementation of the BAC framework

            Level code           Pedagogy                              Examples                 ICAP designation
            A        Lectures                        Bibliometrics courses, lectures, and training  Passive
                     Individual asynchronous, facilitated learning  Instructor-led cloud classrooms and online discussions  Passive
            B        Individual asynchronous, non-facilitated learning Postgraduate students independently study MOOCs, literature,   Active
                                                     and references
                     Application-based learning exercises  Faculty members ask preset discussion questions on the six   Active
                                                     technical steps of bibliometric analysis, and postgraduate
                                                     students conduct their own research and group discussions
                     Team-based learning             During seminars, postgraduate students develop interpretations  Constructive
                                                     of the bibliometric analysis material they have read based on the
                                                     six technical steps
            C        Problem-based learning          Postgraduate students evaluate and critique the six technical   Interactive
                                                     steps of the bibliometric analysis material provided in advance by
                                                     faculty members
                     Small groups (non-facilitated)  Postgraduate students form self-directed small groups  Interactive
                     Simulations                     After being given a research topic, postgraduate students use   Interactive
                                                     computers to conduct simulated bibliometric analyses
            Abbreviations: ICAP: Interactive, constructive, active, and passive; MOOCs: Massive open online courses.


            Volume 8 Issue 1 (2025)                         65                               doi: 10.36922/itps.4734
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76