Page 24 - ITPS-8-3
P. 24

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                      Robotics in modern surgery and critical operations



            previously demonstrated, laparoscopy offers shorter   Author contributions
            hospital stays, smaller surgical scars, and faster recovery.
            In some cases, it has even replaced open surgery as the   Conceptualization: Md. Anisur Rahman, Muhammad
            preferred approach. However, more complex procedures,   Torequl Islam
            particularly intracorporeal anastomosis or extensive   Writing – original draft: Md. Anisur Rahman, Sonia Akter
                                                                  Bristi, Tania Yesmin
            reconstruction, have hindered its widespread adoption.
                                                         39
            Studies comparing robotic surgery to traditional open   Writing – review & editing: Md. Anisur Rahman,
            or laparoscopic procedures found that robotic surgery   Muhammad Torequl Islam
            resulted in shorter hospital stays and produced comparable   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            outcomes in the adult population.  The first robotic
                                          40
            surgical system, da Vinci (Intuitive Surgical, United States   Not applicable.
            of America), received FDA approval in 2000. In a more
            recent study, reported that 20 out of the 24 patients who   Consent for publication
            underwent robot-assisted interventions were successfully   Not applicable.
            treated using the da Vinci. Procedures included eight
            antegrade continence enemas, six bladder neck repair   Availability of data
            surgeries, and 16 appendicovesicostomies.  These findings   Not applicable.
                                             35
            highlight that the robot provides functional outcomes
            similar to those of open or laparoscopic surgeries, while   References
            also offering the benefits inherent in minimally invasive   1.   Thai MT, Phan PT, Hoang TT, Wong S, Lovell NH, Do TN.
            surgery. Although robotic surgery is reliable and effective   Advanced intelligent systems for surgical robotics. Adv Intell
            for complex procedures in children, its advantages must be   Syst. 2020;2:1900138.
            weighed against the increased costs and longer operating      doi: 10.1002/aisy.201900138
            times associated with this technology.  Notably, challenges
                                          19
            remain, such as the mismatch between large instruments   2.   Dzedzickis A, Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė J, Šutinys E, Samukaitė-
            and the small thorax, the higher risk of skin scarring   Bubnienė U, Bučinskas V. Advanced applications of
            compared to a thoracoscopic technique, and the high cost   industrial robotics: New trends and possibilities. Appl Sci.
            of  robotic surgery  for cardiothoracic  disorders. Robotic   2021;12:135.
            cardiothoracic surgery in children remains challenging,      doi: 10.3390/app12010135
            with only a small number of patients being suitable   3.   Macmanus Q, Okies JE, Phillips SJ, Starr A. Surgical
            candidates, and the indications for its use must be closely   considerations in patients undergoing repeat median
                     41
            monitored.  Applications of robotic technology in modern   sternotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975;69:138-143.
            surgery and critical operation are summarized in Table 1.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)41621-8
            3. Conclusion and future perspectives              4.   Güllü AU, Şenay S, Ersin E, et al. Robotic‐assisted cardiac
                                                                  surgery without aortic cross‐clamping: A  safe alternative
            Robotic technology has overcome many of the challenges   approach. J Cardiac Surg. 2021;36:165-1681.
            associated with conventional endoscopic surgery, ushering
            in a new era in medical science that has contributed to a      doi: 10.1111/jocs.15160
            reduction in mortality rates. However, there are concerns   5.   Koulaouzidis G, Charisopoulou D, Bomba P, et al. Robotic-
            that the widespread adoption of advanced robotic      assisted solutions for invasive cardiology, cardiac surgery
            technology could lead to job displacement for doctors and   and routine on-ward tasks: A narrative review. J Cardiovasc
            other healthcare professionals.                       Dev Dis. 2023;10:399.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/jcdd10090399
            Acknowledgments
                                                               6.   Ferguson JM, Pitt B, Kuntz A, et al. Comparing the accuracy
            None.                                                 of the da Vinci Xi and da Vinci Si for image guidance and
                                                                  automation. Int J Med Robot. 2020;16:1-10.
            Funding
                                                                  doi: 10.1002/rcs.2149
            None.
                                                               7.   Ojima T, Nakamura M, Hayata K, Kitadani J, Takeuchi A,
            Conflict of interest                                  Yamaue H. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes
                                                                  using da Vinci S, Si and Xi surgical system for robotic gastric
            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.  cancer surgery. Sci Rep. 2021;11:11063.


            Volume 8 Issue 3 (2025)                         18                               doi: 10.36922/itps.4664
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29