Page 50 - ITPS-8-3
P. 50

INNOSC Theranostics and
            Pharmacological Sciences                                           Precision medicine and beyond in oncology




































            Figure 2. General mechanism of action of antibody-drug conjugate to potentiate the effects of monoclonal antibodies. Created in BioRender. Mito, S.
            (2025) https://BioRender.com/gqcdtct.

            angiogenesis and immunosuppressive regulatory T-cell   combined therapy. Thus, although this combination
            differentiation in  HCC  treated with  camrelizumab and   therapy was found to be well-tolerated, the results did
            apatinib.  As more pathways and clinical data continue   not meet the efficacy threshold and highlighted the need
                   92
            to emerge, genomic and transcriptomic sequencing have   for  further  investigation on  both tremelimumab  and
            been employed to personalize treatment for HCC patients   durvalumab as plausible ICI choices when treating cancers
            based on specific genetic mutations. For example, patients   like PDAC. 94
            with TSC2 inactivation have been treated with everolimus,
            while patients with CDK4 amplification were treated with   A similar area of ongoing research for drug therapy
            palbociclib. 82                                    combinations is the use of  ipilimumab (Yervoy®), a
                                                               cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monoclonal
              Another example of this chemo-immunotherapy      antibody, combined with GVAX (a granulocyte-
            combination effectiveness  is explored in a Phase I   macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting vaccine
            trial combining tremelimumab (Imjudo®), a cytotoxic   cancer therapy) to achieve a greater tumor response and
            T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 monoclonal antibody,   survival  rate.  Although  the  study  revealed  no  improved
            and gemcitabine. The trial suggested that increasing the   OS in patients with metastatic PDAC, it demonstrated
            dosage of the immunotherapy will result in a prolonged OS.   promising biological effects, including increased T-cell
            However, the severity of Grade 3 toxicities also increased   differentiation and M1 macrophage infiltration.  Another
                                                                                                     95
            with increasing drug dose, including thrombocytopenia,   Phase I study of metastatic castration-resistant prostate
            nausea, diarrhea, anemia, neutropenia, and general   cancer patients treated with the same combination of
            weakness; nonetheless, the regimen was generally well-  ipilimumab and GVAX found a notable decline in prostate-
            tolerated under close management.  However, a Phase   specific antigen levels along with adequate clinical activity
                                         93
            II trial investigating tremelimumab combined with   and tolerability. 96
            durvalumab (Imfinzi®), a PD-1/PDL1 inhibitor, reported
            minimal efficacy in PDAC patients, with a median PFS   While anti-PD-1 therapy is especially helpful in
            and OS of 1.5 months and 3.1 months, respectively, and an   targeting tumors with high microsatellite instability and
            ORR of only 3.1%. It was speculated that the active T-cell   DNA mismatch  – which are significantly associated
                                                                            97
            suppression and nitric oxide synthase overexpression   with immunogenic subtypes of CRC, such as Lynch
            created by the dysregulated immune signaling cells   syndrome – combination therapy is crucial in treating
            produced a resistance to the antitumor response of the   microsatellite stable CRC with low immune cell infiltration


            Volume 8 Issue 3 (2025)                         44                          doi: 10.36922/ITPS025140018
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55