Page 38 - JCAU-4-2
P. 38

Multi-Level Housing Governance in Rural Settlement                                                                               Lin & Jia



               different  lenses  with  different  resolution.  It   culture,   and   technology   caused   the
               proposes     a    comprehensive     research   corresponding  changes  of  these  two
               framework  which  integrates  all  the  spatial   controlling  systems  and  led  to  a  series  of
               levels to provide increased depth of research   contradictions  between  them  in  different
               into the specific case.                        periods. Therefore, it can be seen as the key
                    In this research, the three building levels   to  understanding  the  transformations  of  the
               are  discussed  specifically,  to  illustrate  the   built environment in the village.
               formal  transformation  of  space  and  the
               governance power behind it. Generally, there   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
               are  two  governance  systems  that  shape  the   None.
               vernacular  houses  on  different  levels,  a
               formal one from the government office, and
               an informal one from the local community.      FUNDING
               Besides, three agents are engaged in modeling   This work was conducted with the support of
               the issue, which are government, individual    the National Natural Science Fund of China
               (family  or  each  villager),  and  intermediate   (No.  52208018);  Fundamental  Research
               organizations,  with  each  agent  playing  a   Funds  for  the  Central  Universities  (No.
               different  role  at  different  levels  of     FB45001035); Shenzhen Imported Overseas
               construction.                                  High-Level  Talents  Research  Fund  (No.
                    The housing governance that controls the   FB11409007).
               transformation  of  the  built  environment  at
               different  levels  has  clear  hierarchies.  Two   CONFLICT OF INTEREST
               systems  govern  the  village,  which  are  the   The authors declare no conflict of interest.
               administrative  management  as  a  top-down
               system, and the self-management by villagers   AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
               as  a  bottom-up  system.  These  two  systems   Conceptualization: Xiaoyu Lin, Beisi Jia
               control the village on different levels, and the   Funding acquisition: Xiaoyu Lin
               spheres of their influences are distinct during   Investigation: Xiaoyu Lin
               different  socio-economic  periods.  Besides,   Methodology: Xiaoyu Lin, Beisi Jia
               three forces are engaged in modeling the built   Project administration: Xiaoyu Lin
               environment.  They  are  the  government,  the   Writing – original draft: Xiaoyu Lin
               individuals (family or each villager), and the   Writing – review & editing: Xiaoyu Lin, Beisi
               intermediate    organizations.   State   and        Jia
               individuals are the two poles of the society   All  authors  have  read  and  agreed  to  the
               that  the  former  represents  the  official   published version of the manuscript.
               ideology to control the society, and the latter
               represents the daily life of real people. They
               play  different  roles  at  different  levels  of   REFERENCES
               construction.  An  intermediate  organization   [1]  The  Open  Group.  The  Open  Group
               exists as the transitional status between them      Architecture  Framework  (TOGAF),
               to link the local government and individual         online  open  resources,  1999–2006,
               villagers,   different   groups   play   the        https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/
               intermediate  role  in  different  periods.  For    togaf8-doc/arch/chap26.html
               example, in Imperial China, the lineage was    [2]  Collins  P.  Changing  ideals  in  modern
               responsible  for  the  communication  between       architecture,  1750-1950.  1967,  McGill
               the  public  and  private;  and  in  the  planned   Univ. Press, Montreal, 2–13.
               economy of the PRC, this role was played by    [3]  Rudofsky  B.  Architecture  without
               production brigade. Moreover, the changing          architects:  a  short  introduction  to  non-
               contexts  of  the  tangible  and  intangible        pedigreed  architecture.  1964,  UNM
               environment  on  society,  economy,  politics,      Press, Albuquerque.



                AccScience Publishing                                                                  16
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43