Page 95 - JCAU-6-1

Journal of Chinese
Architecture and Urbanism Urban regeneration market mechanism research

Table 1. The main situation of the research object
Governance structure Project type Typical cases Project features Leading participant Market mechanism
Welfare Public space projects Micro public space, State-owned The government The government
guarantee-oriented Chongyong Street, property, public coordinates the promotion
type Yangmeizhuxie Street, Bajiao service and investment, and
New Park market players implement
Facility projects 15 min community life circle, and operate
Fucheng building
Residential projects Guangming Building 17, State-owned or Government financial
Guchengnanlu Community, corporate-owned subsidies, property owners
Beixiaoyuan Community, public housing invest, market players
Dongao Community, implement and operate
Guanghuadongli Community
Economic Industrial projects Jinnovation park, Taigu Corporates’ private State-owned Multi-party market players
growth-oriented type west region, Meike property land enterprises, private jointly invest, build, and
building, Xindadu park, enterprises operate
Beiren park, etc.
Residential projects Zhenwumiao Community, Private residences Private enterprises Government, market, and
Jinsong Community residents jointly invest,
market players implement
and operate
Integrated Regional projects Caixi historic area, Moshikou Mixed property State-owned Government promotion
development-oriented historic area, Nanluoguxiang rights, historic enterprises and financial subsidies,
type alley, Wangfujing area, etc. preservation needs market players coordinate,
implement, and operate
Industrial projects Shougang old industrial zone, Old factory with State-owned Government cooperates
751 park, Xidangengxin park, large-scale enterprises with state-owned
Zhangjiawan design town enterprises to promote and
provide public activities
and service functions

14 district government. On this basis, the district government
balances its expenditure by holding the property rights of
12 the newly built underground service facilities. According
Number of projects 8 6 to the introduction of government administrators, this
10
regeneration method of promoting residents to improve
housing conditions in situ is different from the previous

avoids the path for developers to obtain profits by increasing
2 4 method of relocation and resettlement in different places. It
0 housing prices and can effectively save regeneration
Welfare guarantee- Economic growth- Integrated costs. In addition, the original residents bear about 23%
oriented type oriented type development- costs through repurchasing the rebuilt housing units and
oriented type
Industrial Residential Facility Public space Regional turning the former district government-owned public
property rights into private property rights, referring to the
Figure 2. Typical urban regeneration case in Beijing. Source: Bar chart affordable housing management system. A resident who
by the authors
has lived in the building for decades said that the rebuilt
building was demolished and rebuilt from three-story to house is “completely different” from the previous one,
four-story above ground and one-story below ground, “the living area has increased a lot,” and the three major
with the number of households remaining unchanged problems of “difficulty in going to the toilet, bathing and
and all residents relocated. From the perspective of cooking” have been solved. In the process of regeneration,
government, the municipal and district governments the market player, Jingcheng Group, a district state-owned
cover 78% construction costs of the project, including enterprise belonging to the Dongcheng (Eastern) district,
29% financial support from the municipal and district mainly assumed the role of implementation entity to carry
governments and 49% from the property rights owner, the out demolition and construction, as well as the role of

Volume 6 Issue 1 (2024) 7 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.0885