Page 13 - JCAU-7-3
P. 13

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                               Urban resilience in civil engineering




            Table 1. Environmental impacts and sustainable solutions for resilient infrastructure
            Area of resilient             Environmental impacts                   Sustainable solutions
            infrastructure
            Hydric resources     Floods, droughts, storms, rising sea levels, tornadoes.  Preservation of natural drainage systems, development of
                                                                      drinking water quality monitoring systems.
            Underground construction  Soil displacement, geotechnical risks.  Optimization of underground space utilization, improved
                                                                      climate-resilient structural security.
            Transportation       Greenhouse gas emissions.            Development of suspended infrastructure for cyclists and
                                                                      pedestrians, investment in alternative mobility solutions.
            Electrical power systems  Power grid failures during extreme weather   Underground wiring, satellite-based monitoring for grid
                                 events (e.g., heavy storms), causing accidents and   security.
                                 environmental damage.


            environmental challenges due to sea level rise, requiring   According to ISO 37123, indicators related to the
            protective measures to safeguard local infrastructure.   resilience of underground structures focus on their
            Defensive strategies include the construction of artificial   ability to withstand seismic events and provide secure
            hills  to  elevate  buildings  and the creation of  suspended   spaces during emergencies. These metrics are critical for
            infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians. These solutions   evaluating the structural integrity and functionality of
            aim to mitigate the effects of coastal flooding while   underground infrastructure under stress conditions. As
            ensuring the safety and functionality of affected areas.  noted in the present study, the limited research on this
              The ISO 37123 standard provides specific indicators   topic underscores the importance of advancing innovative
            for monitoring the resilience of water systems, such as   designs and construction techniques that align with
            the percentage of urban areas protected from floods   international resilience standards.
            and  the  availability  of  emergency  water  supply  systems.   3.2.3. Transportation
            Incorporating these metrics into urban planning can guide
            cities in implementing adaptive measures to enhance water   Transportation, as a component of resilient infrastructure,
            management, especially in areas vulnerable to extreme   remains an underexplored topic in this research, with
            hydrological events. For instance, maintaining natural   only a few relevant articles identified. Wang et al. (2020)
            drainage systems aligns with the standard’s emphasis on   examine the effects of climate change on road networks
            sustainability  and  disaster  preparedness.  This  highlights   in a case study; however, their research does not address
            the critical role of resilient hydric resources in supporting   urban resilience in other modes of transportation.
            broader urban resilience goals.                    Similarly, studies by Wu et al. (2022), Fonseca et al. (2017),
                                                               Ge and Zhang (2022), Comert et al. (2018), and Lee et al.
            3.2.2. Underground construction                    (2022) also fail to cover this broader aspect. Among the
            Resilient  infrastructure  includes  underground   selected studies, none specifically focus on alternative
            construction, yet this area remains underexplored in   mobility, a transportation approach that aligns closely with
            academic literature. Subway systems, for instance, are   urban resilience. Sustainable transportation solutions not
            often discussed in the context of space constraints on the   only provide environmentally friendly alternatives and
            ground surface, but their significance extends beyond this   alleviate congestion in large cities but also contribute to
            limitation. Liu et al. (2021) highlight seismic events in which   improved air quality, reduced greenhouse gas emissions,
            underground tunnels remained unaffected, demonstrating   and the development of more connected and accessible
            their  structural resilience.  Historically,  such spaces  have   communities.  Ultimately,  these  measures  enhance  the
            also served as shelters during crises. In addition, the study   overall quality of life.
            examines  underground  drainage  systems,  including  the   ISO 37123 includes key indicators for resilient
            Parisian sewer network, which play a crucial role in urban   transportation systems, such as the percentage of urban
            resilience. However, while the natural protection offered by   areas  served  by  sustainable  public  transport  and  the
            underground construction enhances safety and isolation,   resilience of critical transport infrastructure during
            these structures are often prohibitively expensive to build.   extreme weather events. These indicators highlight the
            As a result, they receive less attention in research, and   necessity of integrating alternative mobility solutions, such
            global investment remains limited beyond key areas such   as cycling infrastructure and electric public transport, into
            as transportation and drainage (Nelson, 2016).     urban resilience strategies. Addressing these gaps in the


            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         7                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.8088
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18