Page 15 - JCAU-7-3
P. 15

Journal of Chinese
            Architecture and Urbanism                                               Urban resilience in civil engineering



            It also recommends implementing integrated policies   values associated with improving ecosystem functions.
            that prioritize material efficiency, regulate emissions, and   This framework also offers models for evaluating and
            reduce dependence on imported resources. By adopting   classifying management actions that promote connectivity.
            ISO 37123 indicators related to resource efficiency and   Unlike other models that primarily focus on the biophysical
            emission control, cities such as Guangzhou can better   aspects of ecosystems, the CBF stands out for its ability to
            evaluate their urban metabolism and implement policies   identify direct benefits to people through functional and
            that mitigate vulnerabilities while fostering sustainable   connected ecosystems. To implement this tool effectively,
            growth.                                            specific goals and actions are planned, and functions and
                                                               resources are clearly delineated. The framework was tested
              According to Zhao  et al. (2022),  urban resilience in
            China has been gradually improving; however, significant   in the expansion of the Portland Metro rail system, aiming
            regional  disparities remain, with cities in eastern China   to reduce passenger vehicle traffic, alleviate congestion,
            demonstrating greater resilience compared to those in   lower air pollution, and support carbon reduction targets,
            central and western regions. These results offer insights   among other objectives.
            for policymakers seeking to enhance  urban  resilience,   The ISO 37123 framework provides a structured
            optimize resource allocation, and promote balanced urban   approach to assessing urban resilience through indicators
            development.                                       that incorporate NBS. For example, metrics related to
                                                               stormwater  management,  urban  heat  mitigation,  and
              China’s advancements in urban resilience can also be
            assessed through the framework of ISO 37123, particularly   biodiversity enhancement align closely with the benefits
                                                               provided by green infrastructure projects. These indicators
            regarding its adoption of renewable energy and sustainable   help quantify the effectiveness of solutions such as rain
            transportation technologies. The disparities among regions   gardens and green streets, ensuring their implementation
            in China, as identified in the current study, highlight the
            importance of standardized indicators for evaluating and   contributes to both environmental and social resilience.
            improving resilience across diverse urban contexts. For   Several benefits were identified, such as the accessibility
            example, cities in eastern China demonstrate a higher   of green spaces within walking distance of neighborhoods,
            alignment with resilience metrics, serving as valuable case   which  enhances  public  health.  In  addition,  the  creation
            studies for global application.                    of green jobs can support local economies and promote
                                                               economically resilient communities. The construction
            3.4. Green infrastructure: Nature-related solutions   of  cycling  and  walking  trails  surrounded  by  diverse
            for urban resilience                               vegetation offers recreational opportunities and improves
            NBSs play an important role in mitigating the damage   urban aesthetics. These paths also help reduce surface
            caused by climate change and reducing hydrological risks,   runoff. However, the risks associated with planning
            high temperatures, and human discomfort. The study by   and implementing the CBF tool were analyzed, such as
            Beyer and Anderson (2020), which was included outside   potential damage to systems caused by tree roots and
            the  database  search,  highlights  how  water  utilities  can   the ongoing costs of tree maintenance. By incorporating
            invest in green infrastructure, such as rain gardens, stream   ISO  37123  metrics,  urban  planners  can  better  evaluate
            restoration, and green streets, instead of relying solely   the  long-term  performance  of these projects, ensuring
            on conventional infrastructure. These solutions not only   that risks – such as maintenance challenges and potential
            address rainwater collection and retention needs but   ecosystem disruptions – are effectively managed. For
            also provide benefits to other municipal departments,   instance, the framework highlights the importance of
            such  as  health,  transportation,  and  education.  monitoring ecological connectivity and social engagement,
            Collaboration between departments, from identifying   both of which are key to maximizing the benefits of green
            needs to implementing solutions, can result in projects   infrastructure. These insights reinforce the role of NBS
            that simultaneously address stormwater management,   in fostering sustainable and resilient cities. Given the
            recreation, education, urban heat reduction, biodiversity   identified risks, strategic solutions and adaptive responses
            enhancement, mobility improvement, and housing     were explored, demonstrating that the CBF is an effective
            expansion. This is achieved by revitalizing rivers and green   tool for urban planning.
            spaces, such as parks, that require ecosystem restoration and   4. Conclusion
            integrating solutions that work in conjunction with nature.
            Hardy et al. (2022) introduce a set of tools and processes   The  primary  aim  of  this  study  was  to  explore  urban
            known as the connectivity benefits framework (CBF),   resilience and its link to various areas of civil engineering,
            which helps professionals identify the ecological and social   such as electricity infrastructure. The analysis examined


            Volume 7 Issue 3 (2025)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/jcau.8088
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20