Page 55 - JCBP-2-2
P. 55
Journal of Clinical and
Basic Psychosomatics Alexithymia as a mediator relationship
Psychol. 2023;14:1072783. 47. Lucock MP, Morley S. The health anxiety questionnaire. Br J
Health Psychol. 1996;1(2):137-150.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1072783
doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.1996.tb00498.x
38. Jakobson LS, Rigby SN. Alexithymia and sensory processing
sensitivity: Areas of overlap and links to sensory processing 48. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and
styles. Front Psychol. 2021;12:583786. Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-based Approach.
2 ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2018.
nd
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.583786
49. Meyer B, Ajchenbrenner M, Bowles DP. Sensory sensitivity,
39. Freyberger H. Supportive psychotherapeutic techniques in
primary and secondary alexithymia. Psychother Psychosom. attachment experiences, and rejection responses among
1977;28:337-345. adults with borderline and avoidant features. J Pers Disord.
2005;19(6):641-658.
doi: 10.1159/000287080
doi: 10.1521/pedi.2005.19.6.641
40. Porcelli P, Leoci C, Guerra V, Taylor GJ, Bagby RM.
A longitudinal study of alexithymia and psychological 50. Iimura S. Sensory-processing sensitivity and COVID-
distress in inflammatory bowel disease. J Psychosom Res. 19 stress in a young population: The mediating role of
1996;41(6):569-573. resilience. Pers Individ Differ. 2022;184:111183.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00221-8 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111183
41. Sivik T. Alexithymia and hypersensitivity to touch and 51. Goldberg LR. An alternative “description of personality”: The big-
palpation. Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 1993;28(2):130-136. five factor structure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;59(6):1216-1229.
doi: 10.1007/BF02691215 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
42. Smith HL, Sriken J, Erford BT. Clinical and research utility 52. McCrae RR, Costa PT. Personality in Adulthood. New York:
of the highly sensitive Person scale. J Ment Health Counsel. The Guildford Press; 1990.
2019;41(3):221-241. 53. Hellwig S, Roth M. Conceptual ambiguities and
doi: 10.17744/mehc.41.3.03 measurement issues in sensory processing sensitivity. J Res
Pers. 2021;93:104130.
43. Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto
Alexithymia scale - I. Item selection and cross-validation of doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104130
the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):23-32. 54. Greven C, Lionetti F, Booth C, et al. Sensory processing
doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 sensitivity in the context of environmental sensitivity:
A critical review and development of research agenda.
44. Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;98:287-305.
Alexithymia Scale - II. Convergent, discriminant, and
concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X 55. Grabe HJ, Frommer J, Ankerhold A, et al. Alexithymia
and outcome in psychotherapy. Psychother Psychosom.
45. Loas G, Otmani O, Fremaux D, Lecercle C, Duflot M, 2008;77(3):189-194.
Delahousse J. Etude de la validité externe, de la fidélité et
détermination des notes seuils des échelles d’alexithymie doi: 10.1159/000119739
de Toronto (TAS et TAS -20) chez un groupe de malades 56. Qin N, Li J, Wu X, et al. Effects of rational emotive behavior
alcooliques (Study of external validity, reliability and therapy on alexithymia, anxiety, depression and sleep quality
determination of threshold scores for the Toronto of older people in nursing homes: A quasi-experimental
Alexithymia Scales [TAS and TAS-20] in a group of alcohol- study. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):280.
dependent patients). L’Encéphale. 1996;22(1):35-40.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01449-9
46. Bridou M. Etude des Principaux Freins et Leviers
Psychologiques Envers L’examen de Dépistage Du Cancer 57. Cleland C, Magura S, Foote J, Rosenblum A, Kosanke N.
Colorectal. Le RôLe particulier de L’anxiété Envers La Santé Psychometric properties of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-
Dans L’adoption de Cette Démarche (Thèse de Doctorat). 20) for substance users. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58(3):299-306.
Tours: Université François Rabelais; 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.11.002
Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024) 13 https://doi.org/10.36922/jcbp.2681

