Page 85 - JCBP-3-1
P. 85

Journal of Clinical and
            Basic Psychosomatics                                                     HDL markers and suicidal ideation



            markers, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression was   with SI exhibited higher levels of inflammatory markers,
            applied to identify the most influential marker within the   including WBC, NEU, hs-CRP, and various HDL-related
            mixture affecting SI prevalence. 25,26  Subgroup analyses were   inflammatory indicators (WHR, NHR, MHR, CHR, and
            also conducted to explore potential heterogeneity in the   PHR),  while  showing  lower  levels  of HDL-C  (Table  1).
            association between HDL-related inflammatory indicators   Furthermore, 13 inflammation-related indicators were
            and SI across various population subgroups.        found to display significantly right-skewed pairwise
              All analyses were performed using R software     correlations (Figure A1).
            (version  4.1.0), with a two-sided  P < 0.05 considered   3.2. Association between HDL-related inflammatory
            statistically significant.                         indicators and SI
            3. Results                                         The results of the weighted logistic regression indicated a
                                                               potential relationship between CHR and SI. In Model 3,
            3.1. General characteristics                       the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was 1.11 (1.02,
            The analysis included 14,554 individuals with a median   1.21). This positive correlation remained consistent
            age of 48 years, of whom approximately 4.04% reported   across other adjusted and quantile models. However, no
            experiencing SI. Compared to individuals without SI,   significant associations were observed between other
            those with SI were generally younger and more likely to   HDL-related inflammatory indicators and SI (Table 2).
            identify as Mexican American, other Hispanic, or other
            race. They were also more likely to be unmarried, have   3.3. RCS analysis
            lower levels of education, live in poverty, smoke, and have   RCS analysis revealed a linear dose–response relationship
            a history of stroke or kidney disease. Notably, participants   between CHR and SI (p  nonlinear  = 0.419, p  overall  = 0.011). No
            Table 1. Characteristics of participants by SI status

            Characteristics                   Total                No SI                 SI            P-value
                                             N=14,554             N=13,966             N=588
            Age (year), median (IQR)      48.00 (34.00,62.00)  49.00 (34.00,62.00)  46.00 (30.00,59.00)  0.001
            Age group, (%)                                                                              0.017
             20 – 39                          34.29                34.03                40.90
             40 – 64                          44.79                44.88                42.33
             ≥65                              20.93                21.09                16.76
            Gender, (%)                                                                                 0.929
             Female                           50.98                50.99                50.76
             Male                             49.02                49.01                49.24
            Race, (%)                                                                                   0.006
             Non-Hispanic White               65.97                66.12                62.24
             Non-Hispanic Black                9.94                10.01                8.34
             Mexican American                  7.64                 7.63                7.94
             Other Hispanic                    6.92                 6.76                11.02
             Other race                        9.52                 9.49                10.45
            Marital status, (%)                                                                         <0.001
             Married/living with a partner    63.27                64.07                43.03
             Divorced/separated/widowed       18.54                18.22                26.7
             Never married                    18.19                17.72                30.27
            Education level, (%)                                                                        <0.001
             <High school                     10.32                10.05                17.12
             High school                       23.9                23.75                27.72
             >High school                     65.78                66.19                55.16
                                                                                                       (Cont'd...)



            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                         79                              doi: 10.36922/jcbp.5084
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90