Page 102 - JCTR-10-1

98 Mardany et al. | Journal of Clinical and Translational Research 2024; 10(1): 93-98
[5] Zamora N, Llamas JM, Cibrian R, Gandia JL, Paredes V. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12029
Cephalometric Measurements from 3D Reconstructed [12] Schwab RJ, Goldberg AN. Upper Airway Assessment:
Images Compared with Conventional 2D Images. Angle Radiographic and Other Imaging Techniques. Otolaryngol
Orthod 2011;81:856-64. Clin North Am 1998;31:931-68.
doi: 10.2319/121210-717.1 doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70100-6
[6] Jadhav M, Bhosale V, Patil A, Shinde S. Comparison of [13] Jakobsone G, Stenvik A, Espeland L. The Effect of Maxillary
Volumetric Dimensions of Pharyngeal Airway for Different Advancement and Impaction on the Upper Airway after
Dentofacial Skeletal Patterns Using Cone Beam Computed Bimaxillary Surgery to Correct Class III Malocclusion.
Tomography. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 2020;62:572-7. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:e369-76.
doi: 10.3897/folmed.62.e48930 doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.022
[7] Alhammadi MS, Almashraqi AA, Halboub E, Almahdi S, [14] Muto T, Takeda S, Kanazawa M, Yamazaki A, Fujiwara Y,
Jali T, Atafi A, et al. Pharyngeal Airway Spaces in Different Mizoguchi I. The Effect of Head Posture on the Pharyngeal
Skeletal Malocclusions: A CBCT 3D Assessment. Cranio Airway Space (PAS). Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2021;39:97-106. 2002;31:579-83.
doi: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1583301 doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0279
[8] Alves PV, Zhao L, O’Gara M, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. [15] Miyamoto K, Ozbek MM, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA. Effect
Three-dimensional Cephalometric Study of Upper Airway of Body Position on Tongue Posture in Awake Patients
Space in Skeletal Class II and III Healthy Patients. with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. Thorax 1997;52:255-9.
J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:1497-507. doi: 10.1136/thx.52.3.255
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31818972ef [16] Elagib T, Kyung HM, Hung BQ, Hong M. Assessment of
[9] Tseng YC, Tsai FC, Chou ST, Hsu CY, Cheng JH, Pharyngeal Airway in Korean Adolescents According to
Chen CM. Evaluation of Pharyngeal Airway Volume for Skeletal Pattern, Sex, and Cervical Vertebral Maturation:
Different Dentofacial Skeletal Patterns Using Cone-beam A Cross-sectional CBCT Study. Korean J Orthod
Computed Tomography. J Dent Sci 2021;16:51-7. 2022;52:345-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.07.015 doi: 10.4041/kjod21.267
[10] Shokri A, Miresmaeili A, Ahmadi A, Amini P, [17] Opdebeeck H, Bell WH, Eisenfeld J, Mishelevich D.
Falah-Kooshki S. Comparison of Pharyngeal Airway Comparative Study between the SFS and LFS Rotation
Volume in Different Skeletal Facial Patterns Using as a Possible Morphogenic Mechanism. Am J Orthod
Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Clin Exp Dent 1978;74:509-21.
2018;10:e1017-28. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90026-x
doi: 10.4317/jced.55033 [18] Di Carlo G, Polimeni A, Melsen B, Cattaneo PM. The
[11] Zheng ZH, Yamaguchi T, Kurihara A, Li HF, Maki K. Relationship between Upper Airways and Craniofacial
Three-dimensional Evaluation of Upper Airway in Patients Morphology Studied in 3D. A CBCT Study. Orthod
with Different Anteroposterior Skeletal Patterns. Orthod Craniofac Res 2015;18:1-11.
Craniofac Res 2014;17:38-48. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12053

Publisher’s note
AccScience Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional
claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.23.00110