Page 78 - JCTR-11-1
P. 78

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                           Pediatric dosing of antituberculosis medicines



               2013;40:597-607.                                   pharmacist’s dilemma. Contemp Pharm Pract. 1980;3:11-4.
               doi: 10.1007/s10928-013-9332-2                  30.  Lack JA, Stuart-Taylor ME. Calculation of drug dosage
                                                                  and body surface area of children.  Br  J  Anaesth.
            21.  Cao Y, Jusko WJ. Applications of minimal physiologically-  1997;78(5):601-605.
               based  pharmacokinetic  models.  J   Pharmacokinet
               Pharmacodyn. 2012;39:711-723.                      doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.601
               doi: 10.1007/s10928-012-9280-2                  31.  Mahmood I. A  simple method for the prediction of
                                                                  therapeutic proteins (monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies
            22.  Björkman S. Reduction and lumping of physiologically based   and non-antibody proteins) for first-in-pediatric dose
               pharmacokinetic models: Prediction of the disposition of   selection: Application of salisbury rule. Antibodies (Basel).
               fentanyl and pethidine in humans by successively simplified   2022;11:66.
               models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2003;30:285-307.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/antib11040066
               doi: 10.1023/a:1026194618660
                                                               32.  Mahmood I. Application of allometric scaling and salisbury
            23.  Björkman S. Prediction of drug disposition in infants and   rule for the prediction of antimalarial drugs for first-in-
               children by means of physiologically based pharmacokinetic   pediatric dose selection. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet.
               (PBPK) modelling: Theophylline and midazolam as model   2023;48:587-594.
               drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;59:691-704.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s13318-023-00848-2
               doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02225.x
                                                               33.  Jing W, Zong Z, Tang B. Population pharmacokinetic analysis
            24.  Mahmood I, Tegenge MA. A  comparative study      of isoniazid among pulmonary tuberculosis patients from
               between  allometric  scaling  and  physiologically  based   China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e01736-19.
               pharmacokinetic modeling for the prediction of drug
               clearance from neonates to adolescents. J Clin Pharmacol.      doi: 10.1128/AAC.01736-19
               2019;59:189-197.                                34.  Thomas L,  Raju  A, Sekhar  C,  et al. Influence of
               doi: 10.1002/jcph.1310                             N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) genotype/single nucleotide
                                                                  polymorphisms on clearance of isoniazid in tuberculosis
            25.  Mahmood I, Tegenge MA. Spreadsheet-based minimal   patients: A systematic review of population pharmacokinetic
               physiological models for the prediction of clearance of   models. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;78:1535-1553.
               therapeutic proteins in pediatric patients. J Clin Pharmacol.
               2021;61:S108-S116.                                 doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03362-7
               doi: 10.1002/jcph.1846                          35.  Box  GE.  Science  and  Statistics.  J  Am Stat Assoc.
                                                                  1976;71:791-799.
            26.  Mahmood I.  A  comparison of  different  methods  for  the
               first-in-pediatric dose selection.  J  Clin Transl Res. 2022;      doi: 10.2307/2286841
               8:369-81.                                       36.  Mahmood I. Misconceptions and issues regarding allometric
            27.  Mahmood I, Ahmad T, Mansoor N, Sharib SM. Prediction   scaling during the drug development process. Expert Opin
               of clearance in neonates and infants (≤ 3  months of   Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14:843-854.
               age) for drugs that are glucuronidated: A  comparative      doi: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1499725
               study between allometric scaling and physiologically
               based pharmacokinetic modeling.  J  Clin Pharmacol.   37.  Glazier DS. Variable metabolic scaling breaks the law:
               2017;57:476-483.                                   From ‘Newtonian’ to ‘Darwinian’ approaches. Proc Biol Sci.
                                                                  2022;289:20221605.
               doi: 10.1002/jcph.837
                                                                  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1605
            28.  Elias GP, Antoniali C, Mariano RC. Comparative study of   38.  Valkengoed D, Krekels E, Knibbe C. All you need to know
               rules employed for calculation of pediatric drug dosage.   about allometric scaling: An integrative review on the
               J Appl Oral Sci. 2005;13:114-119.
                                                                  theoretical basis, empirical evidence, and application in
               doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000200004               human pharmacology. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2024;64:173-192.
            29.  Munzenberger  PJ,  McKercher  P.  Pediatric  dosing--the      doi: 10.1007/s40262-024-01444-6












            Volume 11 Issue 1 (2025)                        72                            doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00070
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83