Page 102 - JCTR-11-3
P. 102

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                                Household arsenic and bladder cancer



            on urinary arsenic concentrations warrants further    of bladder cancer: A systematic review and contemporary
            investigation.                                        update of risk factors in 2018. Eur Urol. 2018;74(6):784-795.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001
            Acknowledgments
                                                               3.   Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A,
            We would like to thank the patients and nursing staff at the   Abnet CC. Association between smoking and risk of bladder
            University of Wisconsin–Madison Health Urologic Clinic   cancer among men and women. JAMA. 2011;306(7):737-745.
            for their contribution.
                                                                  doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1142
            Funding                                            4.   Vineis P, Simonato L. Proportion of lung and bladder cancers
                                                                  in males resulting from occupation: A systematic approach.
            This work  was supported by a  pilot grant  from the   Arch Environ Health. 1991;46(1):6-15.
            University of Wisconsin–Madison Institute for Clinical
            and  Translational  Research,  funded  by  UL1TR002373      doi: 10.1080/00039896.1991.9937423
            from NIH/NCATS. Tudor Borza is supported by AHRQ   5.   Czerniak B, Dinney C, McConkey D. Origins of bladder
            career development award K08HS028474.                 cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016;11:149-174.
            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012513-104703
                                                               6.   Hoebel J, Kroll LE, Fiebig J, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         in total and site-specific cancer incidence in Germany:
            Author contributions                                  A population-based registry study. Front Oncol. 2018;8:402.
                                                                  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00402
            Conceptualization: Lauren Trepanier, Tudor Borza
            Investigation: Lauren Trepanier, Hannah Peterson, Kyle A.   7.   Bryere J, Dejardin O, Launay L, et al. Socioeconomic status
               Richards, Tudor Borza, Margaret A. Knoedler        and site-specific cancer incidence, a Bayesian approach in a
            Methodology: Lauren Trepanier, Hannah Peterson, Abigail   French Cancer Registries Network study. Eur J Cancer Prev.
                                                                  2018;27(4):391-398.
               M.  Wiedmer,  Maria  T.  Jabbour,  Erin  Mani,  Christa
               Dahman                                             doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000326
            Visualization: Lauren Trepanier, Hannah Peterson   8.   O’Meara S, Bhatt NR, Flynn RJ, Manecksha RP, Thomas AZ.
            Writing – original draft: Lauren Trepanier, Hannah    Bladder cancer in Ireland: A 21-year review. Ir J Med Sci.
               Peterson                                           2021;190(2):531-538.
            Writing – review & editing: All authors               doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02318-z

            Ethics approval and consent to participate         9.   Goy J, Rosenberg MW, King WD. Health risk behaviors:
                                                                  Examining social inequalities in bladder and colorectal
            All study procedures were approved by the University of   cancers. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(2):156-162.
            Wisconsin–Madison Institutional Review Board (protocol
            number 2022-1030-CP002), and all patients provided      doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.09.004
            written informed consent.                          10.  Densmore R, Hajizadeh M, Hu M. Trends in socio-economic
                                                                  inequalities in bladder cancer incidence in Canada: 1992-
            Consent for publication                               2010. Can J Public Health. 2019;110(6):722-731.

            The research subjects gave consent to publish their      doi: 10.17269/s41997-019-00227-y
            de-identified data.                                11.  Hayes HM Jr., Hoover R, Tarone RE. Bladder cancer in pet
                                                                  dogs: A sentinel for environmental cancer? Am J Epidemiol.
            Availability of data                                  1981;114(2):229-233.
            Data used in this work are available from the corresponding      doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113186
            author upon reasonable request.
                                                               12.  Lee HW, Wang HT, Weng MW,  et al. Acrolein-  and
            References                                            4-Aminobiphenyl-DNA adducts in human bladder mucosa
                                                                  and tumor tissue and their mutagenicity in human urothelial
            1.   Letasiova S, Medve’ova A, Sovcikova A, et al. Bladder cancer,   cells. Oncotarget. 2014;5(11):3526-3540.
               a review of the environmental risk factors. Environ Health.      doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1954
               2012;11 Suppl 1:S11.
                                                               13.  Hysong TA, Burgess JL, Cebrian Garcia ME, O’Rourke MK.
               doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S11
                                                                  House dust and inorganic urinary arsenic in two
            2.   Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, et al. Epidemiology   Arizona mining towns.  J  Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol.


            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                        96                            doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00065
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106