Page 75 - JCTR-11-3
P. 75

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                              N-NOSE: Early cervical cancer screening



               chemosensation strategy for the early detection of cancer   32.  Asai A, Konno M, Ozaki M,  et al. Scent test using
               metabolites in urine samples. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):17133.  Caenorhabditis elegans to screen for early-stage pancreatic
               doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96613-z                    cancer. Oncotarget. 2021;12(17):1687.
            22.  Inaba S, Shimozono N, Yabuki H, et al. Accuracy evaluation      doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28035
               of the C. elegans cancer test (N-NOSE) using a new combined   33.  Ungkulpasvich U, Hatakeyama H, Hirotsu T, Di Luccio E.
               method. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;27:100370.   Pancreatic cancer and detection methods.  Biomedicines.
               doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100370                   2023;11(9):2557.
            23.  Kusumoto H, Tashiro K, Shimaoka S,  et al. Efficiency      doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092557
               of gastrointestinal cancer detection by nematode-nose   34.  Rengarajan S, Hallem EA. Olfactory circuits and behaviors
               (N-NOSE). In Vivo. 2020;34(1):73-80.               of nematodes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016;41:136-148.
               doi: 10.21873/invivo.11747                         doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.09.002
            24.  Hatakeyama H, Morishita M, Alshammari AH, et al. A non-  35.  Varshney LR, Chen BL, Paniagua E, Hall DH, Chklovskii DB.
               invasive screening method using caenorhabditis elegans   Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal
               for early detection of multiple cancer types: A prospective   network. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(2):e1001066.
               clinical study. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2024;39:101778.
                                                                  doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001066
               doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101778
                                                               36.  Bian  J,  Zhang  H, Meng S,  Liu  Y.  Chemotaxis  of  toward
            25.  Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda   volatile organic compounds from induced by amino acids.
               system: Terminology for reporting results of cervical   J Nematol. 2018;50(1):3-8.
               cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16):2114-2119.
                                                                  doi: 10.21307/jofnem-2018-003
               doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114
                                                               37.  Thompson  M,  Sarabia  Feria  N,  Yoshioka  A,  et al.
            26.  Bertero L, Massa F, Metovic J,  et al. Eighth edition of the   A  Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral assay distinguishes
               UICC classification of malignant tumours: An overview of the   early stage prostate cancer patient urine from controls. Biol
               changes in the pathological tnm classification criteria-what   Open. 2021;10(3):bio057398.
               has changed and why? Virchows Arch. 2018;472:519-531.
                                                                  doi: 10.1242/bio.057398
               doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2276-y
                                                               38.  Archiv V, Burns JS, Manda G. Metabolic pathways of the
            27.  Yoshida K, Hirotsu T, Tagawa T, et al. Odour Concentration-
               dependent olfactory preference change in  C. elegans.  Nat   warburg effect in health and disease: Perspectives of choice,
               Commun. 2012;3(1):739.                             chain or chance. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12):2755.
               doi: 10.1038/ncomms1750                            doi: 10.3390/ijms18122755
            28.  Bargmann CI, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR. Odorant-selective   39.  Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg effect: How does it
               genes and neurons mediate olfaction in  C. elegans.  Cell.   benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41(3):211-218.
               1993;74(3):515-527.                                doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001
               doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80053-H               40.  Troemel ER, Kimmel BE, Bargmann CI. Reprogramming
            29.  Nygård M, Daltveit AK, Thoresen SØ, Nygård JF. Effect of an   chemotaxis  responses:  Sensory  neurons  define  olfactory
               antepartum pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer   preferences in C. elegans. Cell. 1997;91(2):161-169.
               screening programme: A  population-based prospective      doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80399-2
               study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:1-8.
                                                               41.  Emery JD. The challenges of early diagnosis of cancer in
               doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-10                        general practice. Med J Aust. 2015;203(10):391-393.
            30.  Chidyaonga-Maseko  F,  Chirwa  ML,  Muula  AS.     doi: 10.5694/mja15.00527
               Underutilization of cervical cancer prevention services in
               low and middle income countries: A review of contributing   42.  Cleophas TJ, Droogendijk J, Van Ouwerkerk BM. Validating
               factors. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;21(1):231.            diagnostic tests, correct and incorrect methods, new
                                                                  developments. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2008;3(2):70-76.
               doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.231.6350
                                                                  doi: 10.2174/157488408784293697
            31.  Sato Y, Futamura M, Tanaka Y,  et al. Clinical possibility
               of caenorhabditis elegans as a novel evaluation tool for   43.  Shin A, Choi KS, Jun JK, et al. Validity of fecal occult blood
               esophageal  cancer patients receiving chemotherapy:   test in the national cancer screening program, Korea. PLoS
               A prospective study. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3870.  One. 2013;8(11):e79292.
               doi: 10.3390/cancers15153870                       doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079292


            Volume 11 Issue 3 (2025)                        69                            doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00080
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80