Page 72 - JCTR-11-4
P. 72

Journal of Clinical and
            Translational Research                                              Adherence and psoriasis severity in Brazil



            December 9, 2022, with participants receiving treatment   medication?; (3) When you feel better, do you sometimes
            at the Santa Casa de Curitiba Hospital (Dermatology   stop taking your medication?; (4) If you feel worse while
            Department), the Dermatology Service of Mackenzie   taking the medication, do you sometimes stop taking it?
            Evangelical  University  Hospital,  and  the  Specialty   Adherence was classified as follows: High adherence
            Outpatient Clinic of the State University of Londrina   for no positive responses, moderate adherence for 1 or 2
            University Hospital (AEHU).
                                                               positive responses, and low adherence for 3 or 4 positive
              The study included 133 participants, recruited randomly   responses.
            and indirectly through posters advertising the research, in   The questionnaire also inquired whether the patient
            accordance with ethical guidelines. The inclusion criteria   had interrupted or discontinued treatment. If so, the
            for the study required patients with psoriasis at any level of   patient was further questioned about the reasons for the
            activity, diagnosed either clinically or confirmed through   interruption or discontinuation.
            pathological laboratory reports. Individuals under 18 years
            of age and those of indigenous descent were excluded from   The dermatology life quality index (DLQI) was used to
            the  study.  Data  were  collected  by  dermatology  residents   assess the impact of psoriasis on patient quality of life. The
            through interviews after routine consultations, using a   DLQI consists of 10 questions, with total scores ranging
            pre-tested and validated form,  at the participating study   from 0 to 30. Based on the sum of the points, the impact
                                    18
            centers.                                           on quality of life was categorized as follows: 0 – 1 for no
                                                               impact, 2 – 5 for a small impact, 6 – 10 for a moderate
              The  project  was  approved  by  the  Human  Research
            Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Sector at the   impact, 11 – 20 for a very large impact, and 21 – 30 for an
                                                               extremely large impact.
                                                                                 20
            Federal University of Paraná (SCS/UFPR) under approval
            number 4.294.864, issued in 2021.                    Initially, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed.
                                                               This was followed by the Shapiro-Wilk and Shapiro-Francia
              Authorization for data collection at the participating   tests to assess the distribution of the dependent variable
            centers—Santa Casa de Curitiba Hospital, Mackenzie   (psoriasis severity). Spearman’s correlation analysis was
            Evangelical University Hospital, and the University   then conducted to evaluate the correlations between
            Hospital of the State University of Londrina—was granted   variables, presented as rs  values.
                                                                                   2
            following a preliminary project review assessing both
            methodological and ethical aspects. Approval was obtained   3. Results
            from the respective hospital superintendents and ethics
            committees.                                        Table 1 presents the sociodemographic profile of
                                                               the participants. The mean age of participants was
              To assess  participant profiles, sociodemographic   55.09 ± 12.54 years, ranging from 25 to 83 years. Table 2
            information was collected, including sex, age, race or   shows  the  psoriasis  classification  results.  Based  on  the
            ethnicity, current marital status, education level, and   PASI assessment, 65.41% (87/133) of participants had mild
            household income.                                  psoriasis, 24.06% (32/133) had moderate psoriasis, and
              Psoriasis severity was assessed through both clinical   10.53% (14/133) had severe psoriasis. The average self-
            evaluation and patient self-assessment using a 0 – 10 scale.   assessed psoriasis severity on a 0 – 10 scale was 4.06 ± 3.09.
            Clinically, severity was measured using the PASI, which   Notably, 62.41% (83/133) of participants had never
            considers three criteria: Erythema, infiltration, and scaling.   experienced an asymptomatic period, while only 37.59%
            Each criterion is rated on a 0 – 4 intensity scale across   (50/133) reported periods without lesions.
            four body regions: Head, upper limbs, trunk, and lower   Most patients were using topical treatment with
            limbs. In addition to these criteria, the total affected area is   corticosteroids (60.90%), while 30.82% used calcipotriol
            graded on a 0 – 6 scale. The final PASI score is calculated by   (Table A1). Among systemic medications, methotrexate
            summing the intensity ratings for erythema, infiltration,   (21.05%) and acitretin (10.52%) were the most commonly
            and scaling, multiplied by the area grade for each body   used (Table A2), while 17.29% of participants were
            region. The score ranges from 0 to 72, with higher scores   treated with secukinumab, and 16.54% with adalimumab
            indicating more severe psoriasis. 15               (Table A3). Table 3 presents the results related to treatment
              Treatment adherence was assessed using the       adherence among participants. The majority, 75.94%
            Morisky-Green  questionnaire, which includes the   (101/133), reported never interrupting their psoriasis
                        19
            following questions to evaluate adherence: (1) Do you   treatment, while 23.31% (31/133) had started and later
            sometimes have trouble remembering to take your    discontinued treatment. One participant could not recall
            medication?; (2) Do you sometimes neglect to take your   whether they had ever discontinued treatment. The main


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                        66                            doi: 10.36922/jctr.24.00057
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77