Page 79 - MI-1-2
P. 79

Microbes & Immunity                                          Hydrogen alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease



            Fresh mouse feces were collected, and DNA was extracted   blood glucose levels of the HFD group gradually increased
            from the samples using a genomic DNA extraction kit   compared to those of the control group at the 22  week
                                                                                                       nd
            with magnetic beads for soil and fecal samples. The PCR   (P < 0.01) (Figure 2G and E). However, the blood glucose
            amplification procedure was as follows: PCR reaction system   levels in the HFD + H  group were lower than those in the
                                                                                2
            (30 µL): Phusion Master Mix (×2) 15 µL, primer (2 µM) 3   HFD group (P < 0.05), while there was no difference in
            µL (6 µM), fecal gDNA (1 ng/µL) 10 µL (5 – 10 ng), and   the blood glucose levels between the HFD+H  group and
                                                                                                    2
            water 2 µL. The PCR procedure encompasses the following   the control group at the 22  week (P > 0.05) (Figure 2F).
                                                                                     nd
            stages: Pre-denaturation at 98°C for 1  min; followed by   These data suggest that H  inhalation ameliorated
                                                                                        2
            30 cycles of 98°C for 10 min, 50°C for 30 min, and 72°C for   hyperglycemia in NAFLD mice. After the experiment
            30 min; and 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were detected   finished, the mice were fasted overnight, and the OGTT
            by electrophoresis using 2% agarose gel. Then, the PCR   was performed. The fasting blood glucose level of the HFD
            products were mixed in equal concentrations according   group was significantly higher than that of the control group
            to the PCR product concentration. After mixing, the PCR   (P < 0.0001). The fasting blood glucose level of the HFD
            products were purified by electrophoresis using 1 × TAE   + H  group was significantly lower than that of the HFD
                                                                  2
            agarose gel at 2% concentration, and the target bands were   group (P < 0.01) but still higher than that of the control
            recovered by the GeneJET Gel Recovery Kit. The TruSeq   group (P < 0.01) (Figure 2I). The blood glucose level in the
            DNA PCR-free Library Preparation Kit was subsequently   HFD + H  group decreased to the same level as that in the
                                                                       2
            used for library construction. After the constructed library   control group 2 h after glucose administration, but the blood
            was quantified and analyzed with a Qubit instrument, the   glucose in the HFD group was significantly greater than that
            NovaSeq 6000 sequencing system was used for sequencing.  in the control group 2 h after glucose gavage (Figure 2H).
                                                               These results suggest that an HFD induces abnormalities in
            2.8. Statistical analysis
                                                               glucose tolerance in mice and that H  inhalation can reverse
                                                                                           2
            The values in each group were normally distributed, and   HFD-induced abnormalities in glucose tolerance.
            the overall variance was homogeneous in the three groups.   Compared with those in the control group, the levels
            All values are presented as mean ± standard deviation for   of TC (P < 0.05) and TG (P < 0.0001) in the HFD group
            each group. One-way analysis of variance and LSD test   were significantly higher. However, the  levels of TC
            were used to compare the statistical differences among   (P < 0.001) and TG (P < 0.05) in the HFD + H  group were
            multiple groups.  P  < 0.05 was considered significantly   significantly lower than those in the HFD group. There was
                                                                                                   2
            different.  GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, USA)   no significant difference in TG level between the HFD + H
            7was used for statistical analysis.                                                              2
                                                               group and the control group (P > 0.05), although the TC
            3. Results                                         levels in the HFD + H  group were still higher than those in
                                                                                2
                                                               the control group (P < 0.0001) (Figure 3B and C).
            3.1. Effect of H  on the body weight of NAFLD mice
                         2
            We successfully established a NAFLD mouse model that was   3.3. H  administration alleviates liver damage and
                                                                    2
                                                               improves liver function in NAFLD mice
            characterized by typical obesity through an HFD feeding
            protocol. Compared to those in the control group, the mice   Compared with those in the control group, the livers of
            in the HFD and HFD + H  groups stored more fat, with   the mice in the HFD group were significantly larger, with a
                                  2
            knotted and glossy fur, as well as a large accumulation of   tense and smooth envelope, blunted edges, a yellow color,
            fat in the abdominal cavity, as was observed after dissection   scattered yellow fat spots, a soft texture, and a greasy feeling.
            (Figure 2A). The body weights of the mice in both the HFD   The livers of mice in the HFD + H  group were also enlarged
                                                                                         2
            group and the HFD + H  group were significantly greater   in size, with a reddish color but fewer scattered yellow fat
                                2
            than those of the mice in the control group (P < 0.0001), but   spots than those in the HFD group. H&E staining revealed
            there was no significant difference between the HFD group   that the liver structure of HFD group mice was abnormal,
            and the HFD + H  group (P > 0.05) (Figure 2B and C).  with incomplete hepatic lobules and dense voids. Compared
                          2
                                                               with those in the HFD group, the liver morphology and
            3.2. H  administration improves blood glucose levels   structure in the HFD+H  group were greatly restored, and
                 2
                                                                                  2
            and lipid metabolism in mice with NAFLD            the number and area of cavities were reduced, suggesting
            Given that NAFLD is strongly associated with impaired   that H  alleviated the structural abnormalities of the liver
                                                                    2
            levels of TGs and glucose metabolism, we monitored blood   in NAFLD mice. Compared with those in the control
            glucose levels every 2  weeks. There was no significant   group, liver lipid droplets in the HFD group were densely
            difference in random blood glucose levels among the   distributed, and the lipid droplets were larger according to
            control mice at weeks 1, 11, and 22 (P > 0.05). The random   Oil Red O staining. In the HFD+H  group, the distribution
                                                                                          2
            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2024)                         73                               doi: 10.36922/mi.3896
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84