Page 23 - MSAM-1-2
P. 23

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                      Laser absorption and printability of 90W-Ni-Fe


            morphologies [10,11,25-27] . According to the specific impact   The calculated laser absorptivity and their standard
            energy equation :                                  deviations are presented in  Figure  7. As shown from
                         [28]
                                                               Figure 7A, the laser absorptivity of the 90W-Ni-Fe powder
                                   1
                            i
                           E =  n j 1  2 M s Mv 2      (7)    bed model tended to decrease with the increase of milling
                                       bj
                                                               energy. The laser absorptivity decreased significantly
              where, E  is the specific impact energy in ball milling,   when the matrix particles were broken or deformed. The
                     i
            Ms is the mass of powder, M  is the total mass of grinding   standard deviation of calculated laser absorptivity tended
                                   b
            balls,  v  is the relative impact velocity between two   to decrease and then increased with the milling energy
                  j
            grinding balls and/or a ball grinding against the grinding   increasing (Figure 7B). The standard deviation was lowest
            bowel wall, and  n is the number of collision of a ball   when the reinforced particles were uniformly distributed
            against other balls and/or the grinding bowl wall within   and the matrix particles were unbroken or undeformed,
            a second. As can be seen from the above equation, the   indicating that the laser energy conversion factor was high
            higher the milling speed or ball-to-powder weight ratio   and stable. This was attributed to the improved homogeneity
            is applied, the higher the impact energy is obtained. The   of the powder bed [25,26,29] . When the nanoparticles were
            nanoparticle-coated 90W-Ni-Fe powder morphology    agglomerated, the decreased ratio of spot size to irradiated
            evolved with the change of milling energy (Figure  5A).   particles promoted the multiple reflections of the laser,
                                                                                         [8]
            Reinforced particles were gradually dispersed uniformly   improving the laser absorptivity . However, the powder
            with increased specific impact energy in ball milling, but   bed was uneven in this case, so the laser energy conversion
            particle  deformation  and  breakage  were  more  likely  to   was instability, which tended to produce highly unstable
            occur (Figure 5B). When the ball-to-powder weight ratio   molten pools, affecting the printing quality of LPBF [8,14,22] .
            was 1:2, the milling speed was 250  rpm with a milling   When the matrix particles were broken or deformed, the
            time of 6 h, the Ni and Fe nanoparticles were uniformly   powder bed had low packing density and high porosity,
            dispersed around W particles, and the sufficiently high   which weakened the multiple reflections and reduced the
            sphericity of the W matrix particles was maintained.   laser energy conversion factor, affecting the wetting and
            Combining the above, 3D microscopic GO-RT models   spreading of melt during LPBF [8,30,31] . These may cause
            with different powder morphologies were established   balling effects and reduce the printing quality of fabricated
            (Figure 6).                                        specimens [8,24,31] .

                         A


















                         B












            Figure 5. Schematic of the evolution mechanism of nanoparticle-coated powder during ball milling (A) and SEM images showing the different nanoparticle-
            coated 90W-Ni-Fe powder (B).


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         5                      http://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.11
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28