Page 18 - MSAM-1-2

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Flexural behavior of bio-inspired sutures

2796. numerical study on tensile failure behavior of bionic suture
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03313-0 joints. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 92: 40–49.
38. Mazzanti V, Malagutti L, Mollica F, 2019, FDM 3D printing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.001
of polymers containing natural fillers: A review of their 48. Malik IA, Barthelat F, 2018, Bioinspired sutured materials for
mechanical properties. Polymers, 11: 1094. strength and toughness: Pullout mechanisms and geometric
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071094 enrichments. Int J Solids Struct, 138: 118–133.
39. Cuiffo MA, Snyder J, Elliott AM, et al., 2017, Impact of the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.004
fused deposition (FDM) printing process on polylactic acid 49. Miura T, Perlyn CA, Kinboshi M, et al., 2009, Mechanism
(PLA) chemistry and structure. Appl Sci, 7: 579. of skull suture maintenance and interdigitation. J Anat,
https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060579 215: 642–655.
40. Luis E, Pan HM, Sing SL, et al., 2020, 3D direct printing https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01148.x
of silicone meniscus implant using a novel heat-cured 50. Standard A, 2014, ASTM D638-14 Standard Test Method
extrusion-based printer. Polymers, 12: 1031.
for Tensile Properties of Plastics. ASTM International, West
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12051031 Conshohocken, PA.
41. Velasco‐Hogan A, Xu J, Meyers MA, 2018, Additive 51. Blaber BA, Antoniou A, 2015, Ncorr: Open-source 2D
manufacturing as a method to design and optimize digital image correlation matlab software. Exp Mech,
bioinspired structures. Adv Mater, 30: 1800940. 55: 1105–1122.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800940 52. Peng C, Fox K, Qian M, et al., 2021, 3D printed sandwich
42. Wang D, Chen D, Chen Z, 2020, Recent progress in 3D beams with bioinspired cores: Mechanical performance and
printing of bioinspired structures. Front Mater, 7: 286. modelling. Thin Walled Struct, 161: 107471.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107471
43. Ehrmann G, Ehrmann A, 2021, Investigation of the shape- 53. Habib F, Iovenitti P, Masood S, et al., 2017, In-plane energy
memory properties of 3D printed PLA structures with absorption evaluation of 3D printed polymeric honeycombs.
different infills. Polymers, 13: 164. Virtual Phys Prototyp, 12: 117–131.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13010164 https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2017.1291354
44. Raj SA, Muthukumaran E, Jayakrishna K, 2018, A case study 54. Kardel K, Ghaednia H, Carrano AL, et al., Experimental and
of 3D printed PLA and its mechanical properties. Mater theoretical modeling of behavior of 3D-printed polymers
Today Proc, 5: 11219–26. under collision with a rigid rod. Addit Manuf, 14: 87–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.01.146 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.01.004
45. Kiendl J, Gao C, 2020, Controlling toughness and strength 55. Lee SH, Lee KG, Hwang JH, et al., 2019, Evaluation of
of FDM 3D-printed PLA components through the raster mechanical strength and bone regeneration ability of 3D
layup. Compos B Eng, 180: 107562. printed kagome-structure scaffold using rabbit calvarial
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107562 defect model. Mater Sci Eng C, 98: 949–959.
46. Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK, 2018, Effect of process parameters https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.050
on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp 56. Liu L, Jiang Y, Boyce M, et al., 2017, The effects of morphological
J, 24: 1317–1324. irregularity on the mechanical behavior of interdigitated
https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134 biological sutures under tension. J Biomech, 58: 71–78.
47. Cao Y, Wang W, Wang J, et al., 2019, Experimental and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.017

Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022) 12 https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.9