Page 15 - MSAM-1-2
P. 15

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                          Flexural behavior of bio-inspired sutures



            Table 2 . The percentage increments of the maximum   as 2 J, 2.5 J, and 3 J. Bending stiffness values indicate that
            loads in design configuration one compared to the design   compared to S1, both S2 and S3 designs are harder to bend.
            configuration two
                                                               (i)  When changing the positioning angle of the
                          S1            S2            S3          suture component, the total displacement before
            0°           13 %          18 %           15 %        the failure was slightly increased compared to the
            2°           14 %          16 %           16 %        S3, in both S3-2° and S3-5°. Further increment in
            5°           15 %          18 %           19 %        the angle up to 8° has noticeably reduced the total
                                                                  displacement at  failure  compared  to S3  specimen
            8°           14 %          21 %           19 %
                                                                  as the stress is concentrated mainly in the weaker
                                                                  semi suture module at the bottom rather than
              Comparing the results of design configurations one and   uniformly distributing through the whole suture
            two, as given in Figure 9A and B, the maximum load obtained   structure. In all three cases, flexural strengths and
            by samples S1, S2, and S3 in configuration one is higher   energy absorptions were slightly reduced compared
            than in configuration two. The percentage increment of the   to S3. The variation in  bending stiffness values
            maximum loads in design configuration one compared to   suggests that by changing the positioning angle of
            the design configuration two is given in Table 2.     the sutures, the stiffness of the whole structure could
              Similar to the experimental results, higher stress occurs   be improved.
            in the bottom semi suture module in every design where   (ii)  DIC results indicate that adjacent interlocking suture
            the first failure occurs. In design configuration one, weaker   modules  exert tension and  compression on  each
            bottom semi suture modules (highlighted in green circle in   other due to their interlocking feature. When the top
            Figure 9A) are attached to the bigger side parts, where they   suture modules exert tension on the necking area of
            gain support for the stress distribution; hence, this design   the bottom suture module, the head of the bottom
            configuration can withstand a higher load. In configuration   suture module curls up and compresses the top suture
            two, weaker bottom semi suture modules (highlighted in   module, and instead of moving down before fracture
            green circle in Figure 9B) are connected to the middle part of   occurs in its necking area.
            the specimen, where it gains support only from the middle   (iii) Numerical simulation showed good agreement with
            part for the stress distribution, as shown in Figure 9B. This   the experimental results. The model was assumed to
            leads the design configuration two to withstand a lower   be elastic-perfectly plastic, even though FDM prints
            maximum load compared to the configuration one.       contain defects due to the printing process. The model
                                                                  reveals that introducing larger suture modules with
              This parametric study showed that the maximum       less interlocking points allows more uniform stress
            load the structure can withstand could be improved by   distribution along  the  suture structure  compared  to
            combining symmetrical suture lines, correlating with the   S1 and S2, where the stress was mainly concentrated
            inclined angle increment. The placement of the weaker   to the suture modules at the bottom of the specimen.
            link within the suture structure also significantly impacts   (iv)  The parametric study was performed on beam samples
            the highest load the structure can withstand.         with two symmetrical suture lines, which considerably
                                                                  enhanced the ability to withstand a higher load. The
            4. Conclusion
                                                                  load-bearing ability of  the structure was  further
            The research was conducted to investigate the flexural   improved with the increment of the inclined angle. The
            behavior of bio-inspired suture structures. The specimens   simulation results also confirm that positioning of the
            were developed with three different sizes as S1, S2, and S3   interlocking suture modules plays an important role in
            using 3D printing of PLA thermoplastic while maintaining   enhancing the load-bearing properties of the structure.
            the ratio between the minor and major radii of the elliptical   The parametric study concluded that the position of
            suture shape to 1:1.8. S3 design was used to develop S3-2°,   the suture components has a significant impact on the
            S3-5°, and S3-8°, varying the positioning angles by 2°, 5°,   mechanical performance of the whole structure.
            and 8° to analyze the effect of the positioning angle. The   (v)  These sutures could be beneficial in many ways
            S1 specimen withstood maximum load during the three-  when developing a structural design. Incorporating
            point bending test but failed within short displacement,   a suture joint creates a pre-established crack path
            whereas S3 showed higher displacement before the failure   which would help to predict the fracture behavior
            but with a lower maximum load. The flexural strengths of S1,   by analyzing the suture pattern while maintaining
            S2, and S3 were noted to be 28 MPa, 24 MPa, and 26 MPa,   flexibility.  As  the  suture  joint  is  developed  without
            while the energy absorption of each design was calculated   any adhesive materials, this interlocking mechanism

            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         9                      https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.9
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20