Page 11 - MSAM-1-2
P. 11

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                          Flexural behavior of bio-inspired sutures


            44 mm, and 4 mm, with a span length of 100 mm. The   It is worth mentioning that the material anisotropy and
            test setup without and with a PLA specimen is given in   localized defects that occur due to the 3D printing process
            Figure  3G and H. The crosshead displacement rate was   are not considered in this analytical model. Through
            maintained to be 1 mm/min, and a 1 N preload was applied   displacement  boundary  conditions,  loading  was  applied
            to ensure proper contact between the test specimen and   to the top roller, while two bottom supporting rollers
            the impactor. Five specimens were tested for each design.   were encastered. Hard contact formulation was utilized to
            The centered cylindrical roller with 10 mm diameter and   create normal contact behavior between the rollers and the
            two supporting rollers at the bottom with 10 mm diameter   test specimens, and tangential behavior was defined using
            were utilized to perform the three-point bending test.  penalty friction formulation with a friction coefficient
                                                               of 0.3. A two-dimensional model was developed to save
            2.3. DIC
                                                               the cost and time of the simulation for S1, S2, S3, S3-2°,
            DIC was conducted using Ncorr open source 2D Matlab   S3-5°, and S3-8° with 38029 linear quadrilateral elements
            software to analyze the strain field generation during the   of  type  CPS4R.  The  load  of  the  top  roller  was  further
                     [51]
            flexural test . The region of interest (ROI) for the DIC   analyzed, and the bending stiffness of each specimen is
            was carefully selected to obtain the maximum results. As   calculated  by  the slope  of  the  linear  part  of  the  force-
            the specimen was built by connecting two parts, during   displacement curve.
            three-point bending, the two parts started to separate, and
            creating a gap between the parts; hence, to eliminate the   3. Results and discussion
            negative impact on the DIC results, selecting the ROI was   3.1. Experimental results
            done separately for the two parts.
                                                               The force-displacement curves of S1, S2, and S3 are given in
            2.4. Numerical simulation                          Figure 4A. The number of suture ligaments in each design
            A finite element model to simulate the suture inspired   decreased with the increment of the size of the suture unit,
            structure under a three-point bending test was developed   thereby affecting the maximum load the structure can
            using ABAQUS/Explicit 2020 (Dassault Systems Simulia   withstand before the failure. As per the force-displacement
            Corp., Providence, RI). Three rollers having 10  mm   curves, it is evident that the S1  specimen withstand the
            diameter were modeled, and the test specimen was placed   highest load  while  the  S2  specimen  indicates the  lowest
            between the rollers according to the actual experimental   maximum load. When it comes to the S3 specimen, the
            setup. Metal rollers are treated as rigid bodies for the   maximum load it can withstand had increased compared
            simplification of the simulation since they are significantly   to S2 but was still lower than the S1. In all three cases, the
            rigid  compared  to  the  PLA  specimens.  The  constitutive   force-displacement curves exhibit a similar pattern. Once
            behavior of the suture inspired test specimens is considered   the lowest suture ligament fails, the load suddenly drops,
            to be elastic-perfectly plastic based on the literature [52-55] .   then starts to increase again and experiences another


                         A


                                                      C              D             E






                         B                             F             G            H










            Figure 4. (A) Force-displacement curves of S1, S2, and S3. (B) Force- displacement curves of S3, S3-2°, S3-5°, and S3-8°; the failure points highlighted in
            yellow for (C) S1- first & second points, (D) S2 - first & second points, (E) S3 - first & second points (F) S3-2, (G) S3-5°, (H) S3-8°


            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2022)                         5                      https://doi.org/10.18063/msam.v1i2.9
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16