Page 24 - MSAM-2-2

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Union of 2D nanomaterials and 3D printing

95. Guo F, Creighton M, Chen Y, et al., 2014, Porous structures for potential neuralized bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B,
in stacked, crumpled and pillared graphene-based 3D 11: 1288–1301.
materials. Carbon N Y, 66: 476–484.
https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb01979e
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.024
107. Xu C, Xu Y, Yang M, et al., 2020, Black‐phosphorus‐
96. Mundinamani S, 2020, Large area, multilayer graphene films incorporated hydrogel as a conductive and biodegradable
as a flexible electronic material. ACS Omega, 5: 17479–17485. platform for the enhancement of the neural differentiation
of mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Funct Mater, 30: 2000177.
97. Kang ES, Kim H, Han Y, et al., 2021, Enhancing osteogenesis
of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells using gold 108. Simon JD, Peles DN, 2010, The red and the black. Acc Chem
nanostructure/peptide-nanopatterned graphene oxide. Res, 43: 1452–1460.
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 204: 111807. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar100079y
98. Long X, Duan L, Weng W, et al., 2021, Light-induced 109. Tondera C, Akbar TF, Thomas AK, et al., 2019, Highly
osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs with graphene/ conductive, stretchable, and cell‐adhesive hydrogel by
TiO composite coating on Ti implant. Colloids Surf B nanoclay doping. Small, 15: e1901406.
2
Biointerfaces, 207: 111996.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201901406
99. Lee SM, Kim JH, Ahn JH, 2015, Graphene as a flexible
electronic material: Mechanical limitations by defect 110. Ou L, Song B, Liang H, et al., 2016, Toxicity of graphene-
formation and efforts to overcome. Mater Today, family nanoparticles: A general review of the origins and
18: 336–344. mechanisms. Part Fibre Toxicol, 13: 57.
100. Li P, Cao K, Jiang C, et al., 2019, In situ tensile fracturing 111. Fadeel B, Bussy C, Merino S, et al., 2018, Safety assessment
of multilayer graphene nanosheets for their in-plane of graphene-based materials: Focus on human health and
mechanical properties. Nanotechnology, 30: 475708. the environment. ACS Nano, 12: 10582–10620.
101. Qian Y, Zhao X, Han Q, et al., 2018, An integrated multi- 112. Rhazouani A, Gamrani H, El Achaby M, et al., 2021,
layer 3D-fabrication of PDA/RGD coated graphene loaded Synthesis and toxicity of graphene oxide nanoparticles:
PCL nanoscaffold for peripheral nerve restoration. Nat A literature review of in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomed Res
Commun, 9: 323. Int, 2021: 5518999.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02598-7 https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5518999
102. Huang CT, Shrestha LK, Ariga K, et al., 2017, A graphene– 113. Fatima J, Shah AN, Tahir MB, et al., 2022, Tunable 2D
polyurethane composite hydrogel as a potential bioink for nanomaterials; their key roles and mechanisms in water
3D bioprinting and differentiation of neural stem cells. purification and monitoring. Front Environ Sci, 10: 766743.
J Mater Chem B, 5: 8854–8864. 114. Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A, 2020, Opportunities and
103. Siqueira PR, Souza JP, Estevão BM, et al., 2022, challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat Biomed Eng,
Concentration-and time-dependence toxicity of graphene 4: 370–380.
oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0471-7
upon zebrafish liver cell line. Aquat Toxicol, 248: 106199.
115. Sawosz E, Jaworski S, Kutwin M, et al., 2014, Toxicity of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106199 pristine graphene in experiments in a chicken embryo
104. Vijayavenkataraman S, Thaharah S, Zhang S, et al., 2019, model. Int J Nanomed, 9: 3913.
3D‐printed PCL/rGO conductive scaffolds for peripheral https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S65633
nerve injury repair. Artif Organs, 43: 515–523.
116. Jaworski S, Sawosz E, Kutwin M, et al., 2015, In vitro and in
https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13360 vivo effects of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide
on glioblastoma. Int J Nanomed, 10: 1585–1596.
105. Qing H, Ji Y, Li W, et al., 2019, Microfluidic printing of three-
dimensional graphene electroactive microfibrous scaffolds. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S77591
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12: 2049–2058.
117. Jin L, Hu P, Wang Y, et al., 2020, Fast‐acting black‐
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b17948 phosphorus‐assisted depression therapy with low toxicity.
Adv Mater, 32: e1906050.
106. Zhang X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, et al., 2023, 3D printed
reduced graphene oxide-GelMA hybrid hydrogel scaffolds https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201906050

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023) 18 https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.0620