Page 100 - MSAM-2-4
P. 100

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                          3D-printed composite auxetic structures




                         A                                     B



























            Figure 14. Failures in test specimens. (A) The fracture occurred in the test specimens without infilled continuous fiber. (B) The warpage deformation
            occurred in the fiber-reinforced test specimens.

            Table 2. Properties of test specimens              4. Conclusion

            Structures     Tensile   Tensile   Weight  Carbon fiber   In this work, we successfully investigated the mechanical
                           modulus   strength   (g)  ratio (%)  properties of 3D-printed continuous fiber-reinforced
                           (MPa)   (MPa)                       composite auxetic structures in the uniaxial tensile test.
            Rotating rigid   22.45  1.039  9.03     0.00       The major highlight of this study is that the addition of
            Rotating rigid FR1  60.55  2.883  9.48  4.75       continuous  fiber  can  significantly enhance  the  tensile
            Rotating rigid FR2  51.68  2.891  9.39  3.83       properties of auxetic structures. With only a 3.83% mass
            Rotating rigid FR3  30.65  1.180  9.24  2.27       increase, the tensile modulus and tensile strength of
            Re-entrant      114.19  2.836  5.92     0.00       rotating rigid FR2 almost tripled as compared with the
            Re-entrant FR1  150.02  5.781  6.52     9.20       specimens without infill fibers. Owing to the anisotropy
                                                               of continuous fibers, the direction of the fiber path plays
            Re-entrant FR2  189.25  4.229  7.30    18.90       a key role in the tensile properties. The auxetic behavior
            Rhombus         13.64   1.109  5.68     0.00       can be strengthened by limiting axial deformation caused
            Rhombus FR      49.58   2.742  6.61    14.07       by axial reinforcing fibers. Our findings also showed that
                                                               rotating  rigid  FR2  and  re-entrant  FR1  similarly  achieve
            Poison’s ratios. Along with the increase in tensile strain, the   improvements  in  stiffness,  strength,  and  auxeticity
            fibers were found to straighten and separate from the base   following the addition of continuous fibers. However, the
            material, as shown in Figure 13A.                  inappropriate addition of continuous fibers can weaken the
                                                               auxeticity behavior due to the increasing rigidity of joints.
              In summary, the addition of fibers does influence the
            auxetic behavior of both rotating rigid and re-entrant   Acknowledgments
            structures. The auxetic behavior can be strengthened by
            allocating axial fibers to limit axial deformation, thereby   None.
            making  the  mechanism-type  deformation  the  dominant   Funding
            form of deformation. On the other hand, the inappropriate
            addition of continuous fibers may weaken the auxetic   The authors would like to acknowledge the support from
            behavior as a result of the accumulation of too many   Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development
            materials at the joints, causing high rigidity that blocks   Program (Major Scientific and Technological Innovation
            mechanism-type deformation.                        Project) (2021CXGC010206).



            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023)                         10                      https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.2159
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104