Page 68 - MSAM-3-1
P. 68

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                      Customized scans and dwell time on AM 316L



            single-phase γ-austenitic FCC phase without any δ-ferrite   Further disclosure
            phase. A more uniform microstructure was observed with
            a bidirectional scan pattern and an increase in interlayer   A part of this research work was presented at the
                                                               International Conference of Advanced Manufacturing
            dwell time. Internal defect analysis using computed   (ICAM), 2023, ASTM, Washington D.C.
            tomography revealed a slightly higher lack-of-fusion
            porosity in specimens prepared with bidirectional scan   References
            patterns, and this porosity increased with longer interlayer
            dwell times. Despite the finer microstructure achieved   1.   Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: A  review.
                                                                  J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23(6):1917-1928.
            with bidirectional scan patterns and extended interlayer
            dwell times, a slight deterioration in mechanical properties      doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
            was observed due to the higher degree of porosity.   2.   DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, et al. Additive manufacturing
            This highlights a tradeoff between achieving a uniform   of metallic components -process, structure and properties.
            microstructure and maintaining mechanical integrity,   Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112-224.
            emphasizing the importance of optimizing scan patterns      doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
            and interlayer dwell times for desired material properties   3.   Sames  WJ,  List  FA,  Pannala  S,  Dehoff  RR,  Babu  SS.  The
            in parts made by AM.                                  metallurgy  and processing science of  metal  additive

            Acknowledgments                                       manufacturing. Int Mater Rev. 2016;61(5):315-360.
                                                                  doi: 10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649
            The authors would like to acknowledge the University of
            Houston Division of Research High Priority Area Research   4.   Zhai X, Jin L, Jiang J. A survey of additive manufacturing
                                                                  reviews. Mater Sci Addit Manuf. 2022;1(4):21.
            Large Equipment Grant I0503304 for establishing a state-
            of-the-art 2D-XRD facility used in this study.        doi: 10.18063/msam.v1i4.21
                                                               5.   Turgut B, Gürol U, Onler R. Effect of interlayer dwell time
            Funding                                               on output quality in wire arc additive manufacturing of low
            This research received no specific grant from any funding   carbon low alloy steel components. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.
            agency.                                               2023;126(11-12):5277-5288.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/s00170-023-11481-3
            Conflict of interest
                                                               6.   D’Andrea D. Additive manufacturing of AISI 316L stainless
            The authors declare that they have no known competing   steel: A review. Metals (Basel). 2023;13(8):1370.
            financial interests or personal relationships that could have      doi: 10.3390/met13081370
            appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
                                                               7.   Thompson SM, Bian L, Shamsaei N, Yadollahi A. An overview
            Author contributions                                  of direct laser deposition for additive manufacturing; Part I:
                                                                  Transport phenomena, modeling and diagnostics.  Addit
            Conceptualization: Puskar Pathak                      Manuf. 2015;8:36-62.
            Data curation: Puskar Pathak, Goran Majkic            doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001
            Methodology: Puskar Pathak
            Supervision: Venkat Selvamanickam                  8.   Balhara H, Botcha B, Wolff SJ, Bukkapatnam STS. Ripple
                                                                  formations determine the heterogeneous microstructure
            Writing – original draft: Puskar Pathak               of directed energy deposition (DED)-printed 316L
            Writing  – review  &  editing: Goran Majkic, Venkat   components. Mater Des. 2023;227:2023.
               Selvamanickam
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111756
            Ethics approval and consent to participate         9.   Izadi M, Farzaneh A, Mohammed M, Gibson I, Rolfe B.
                                                                  A  review of laser engineered net shaping (LENS) build
            Not applicable.
                                                                  and process parameters of metallic parts. Rapid Prototyp J.
            Consent for publication                               2020;26(6):1059-1078.
                                                                  doi: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2018-0088
            Not applicable.
                                                               10.  Pathak P, Majkic G, Erickson T, Chen T, Selvamanickam V.
            Availability of data                                  Two-dimensional X-ray diffraction (2D-XRD) and micro-
                                                                  computed tomography (micro-CT) characterization of
            Data are available from the corresponding author upon   additively manufactured 316L stainless steel. Available at
            reasonable request.                                   SSRN 4529173 (2023).


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         9                       https://doi.org/10.36922/msam.2676
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73