Page 81 - MSAM-3-2

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing Mechanical properties of NiTi TPMS

compressive strength of RGCS-A6 only increased by Availability of data
22.23%, reaching 29.38 MPa. In addition, after aging
heat treatment, a plethora of dimples appeared in The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings
the fractures of RGCS-A2, SGCS-A2, and SGCS-A4, of this study are available within the article.
indicating that the fracture mechanism was ductile. References
(iii) Under a 6% compressive strain, SGCS exhibits excellent
superelasticity. The superelastic response of SGCS is 1. Mohamed OA, Masood SH, Xu W. Nickel-titanium shape
superior to that of RGCS. The shape recovery ratio memory alloys made by selective laser melting: A review on
process optimisation. Adv Manuf. 2022;10(1):24-58.
of RGCS-A0 was 36.93%, while the shape recovery
ratio of SGCS-A0 was 40.7%. With the extension of doi: 10.1007/s40436-021-00376-9
aging time, the recovery ratio of both SGCS and RGCS 2. Wei S, Zhang J, Zhang L, et al. Laser powder bed fusion
increased gradually. Specifically, the shape recoveries additive manufacturing of NiTi shape memory alloys:
of RGCS-A6 and SGCS-A6 were increased to 97.63% A review Int J Extreme Manuf. 2023;5(3):032001.
and 97.62%, respectively. doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/acc7d9

Acknowledgments 3. Zhang Y, Attarilar S, Wang L, Lu W, Yang J, Fu Y. A review
on design and mechanical properties of additively
None. manufactured NiTi implants for orthopedic applications. Int
J Bioprint. 2021;7(2):340.
Funding
doi: 10.18063/ijb.v7i2.340
This research was funded by the Guangdong Natural 4. Feng J, Fu J, Yao X, He Y. Triply periodic minimal surface
Science Foundation (No. 2023A1515012704), Guangdong (TPMS) porous structures: From multi-scale design, precise
Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation-Youth Fund additive manufacturing to multidisciplinary applications.
Project (No. 2021A1515110033), Program for scientific Int J Extreme Manuf. 2022;4(2):022001.
research start-up funds of Guangdong Ocean University
(360302022201), and GDA’s Project of Science and doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ac5be6
Technology Development (2022GDASZH-2022010107). 5. Farber E, Orlov A, Borisov E, et al. TiNi alloy lattice structures
with negative Poisson’s ratio: Computer simulation and
Conflict of interest experimental results. Metals. 2022;12(9):1476.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. doi: 10.3390/met12091476
6. Li S, Hassanin H, Attallah MM, Adkins NJ, Essa K. The
Author contributions development of TiNi-based negative Poisson’s ratio structure
Conceptualization: Mingkang Zhang using selective laser melting. Acta Mater. 2016;105:75-83.
Formal analysis: Jinwei Li, Chang Liu, Wenbin Liu doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.017
Funding acquisition: Mingkang Zhang, Jie Chen 7. Pan C, Han Y, Lu J. Design and optimization of lattice
Investigation: Jinwei Li, Mingkang Zhang structures: A review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(18):6374.
Methodology: Jinwei Li, Wenbin Liu
Project administration: Mingkang Zhang doi: 10.3390/app10186374
Supervision: Mingjian Deng 8. Maconachie T, Leary M, Lozanovski B, et al. SLM lattice
Visualization: Chang Liu, Wenbin Liu structures: Properties, performance, applications and
Writing – original draft: Jinwei Li challenges. Mater Des. 2019;183:108137.
Writing – review & editing: Mingkang Zhang, Mingjian doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137
Deng, Jie Chen
9. Du Plessis A, Razavi SM, Benedetti M, et al. Properties and
All authors have read and agreed to the published version applications of additively manufactured metallic cellular
of the manuscript. materials: A review. Prog Mater Sci. 2022;125:100918.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100918
Ethics approval and consent to participate
10. Elahinia M, Moghaddam NS, Andani MT, Amerinatanzi A,
Not applicable. Bimber BA, Hamilton RF. Fabrication of NiTi through
additive manufacturing: A review. Prog Mater Sci.
Consent for publication 2016;83:630-663.
Not applicable. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.001

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2024) 18 doi: 10.36922/msam.3137