Page 79 - MSAM-4-1
P. 79

Materials Science in Additive Manufacturing                        SLM of ODS steel: Process and properties



            swelling,  which is quite necessary for nuclear reactor   size of oxides in the materials obtained by SLM is larger (in
                   3
            application.                                       the order of 30 – 60 nm), compared to particles obtained by
              At  present,  the  most  extensively  studied  and   powder metallurgy methods (typically 1 – 10 nm). 18-20  The
            widely utilized method of strengthening involves the   size of the yttrium-based dispersoids influences coherency,
            incorporation of yttrium-based nano-oxides. Numerous   and the size above 20  nm results in agglomeration and
                                                                        21
            studies have demonstrated the efficacy of yttrium oxide   coarsening,  which reduces the positive effect of their
            (Y O ) additions in enhancing the mechanical strength   implementation.
              2
                3
            of steels and various other alloys. This enhancement in   A notable challenge associated with the use of powders
            strength is accompanied by an improvement in resistance   derived from mechanical alloying is their splintered
            to radiation-induced swelling under exposure to fission   morphology,  resulting from the high mechanical stresses
                                                                         22
            ions or neutrons. Furthermore, dispersion strengthening   applied during the process. This irregular particle shape
            through nano-oxides significantly increases the hardness   leads to poor flowability, which may be a limitation for
            of the matrix material, thereby contributing to an   the applications of mechanically alloyed powders in
            improvement in wear resistance.  The most common   AM.  Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that the
                                        4
                                                                  23
            addition of oxides is in the order of 0.25 – 1.0 wt.%. In   morphology and particle size distribution of the powder
            addition to yttrium, other elements may be added to form   material significantly influences the  final  properties  of
            complex oxides such as Y X O , where X = Ti, Al, Zr, Hf,   products fabricated through AM methods. To address
                                     p
                                  m
                                n
                     5,6
            V, Si, or Ta.  The formation enthalpy of this type of oxide   these limitations, mechanically alloyed powders require
            is lower than that of Y O .                        spheroidization before use.  The plasma spheroidization
                                                                                     24
                               3
                             2
              The fabrication of ODS steels remains a significant   process involves a melting stage during which oxide
            challenge. The most prevalent method of production   particles tend to coagulate and migrate to the surface of
            involves powder  metallurgy, specifically mechanical   the molten material due to their relatively lower density
            alloying. 7-10   Creating  products  with  complex  geometries   compared to the metallic matrix. Consequently, the
            using powder metallurgy methods is an expensive and   resulting spherical powder exhibits non-uniform oxide
                                                                        24
            time-consuming process. One of the most common     dispersion,  which can negatively impact the mechanical
            processes used to produce ODS steels is hot isostatic   properties of the final product.
            pressing (HIP) 2,11,12  and spark plasma sintering. 13-15    For the production of ODS steels by SLM, not only can
            However, the use of these techniques is advisable in cases   mechanically alloyed powders be used, but also various in
            of production of simple and symmetrical shapes.
                                                               situ synthesis methods when oxides are forming during the
              Another critical limitation is the relatively poor   printing process. In Jia et al.’s study,  pre-alloyed powders
                                                                                           25
            weldability of ODS steels, which increases the cost and   were used for the in situ synthesis of nanoparticles in ODS
            complexity  of  manufacturing  components  with  intricate   steel during SLM by controlling the partial pressure of
            geometries. Consequently, there is growing interest in   oxygen to prevent the abnormal growth of particles. This
            exploring the feasibility of producing ODS steels through   approach resulted in the formation of a microstructure
            additive manufacturing (AM) techniques. AM has already   characterized by finer nanoparticles, a higher volume
            shown itself to be a state-of-the-art manufacturing process   fraction, and a more uniform spatial distribution and
            that allows the production of complex-shaped products   size consistency compared to the majority of ODS steels
            with high mechanical properties. One of the most   manufactured using SLM with mechanically alloyed
            commonly used technologies for the production of metal   powders. The influence of the properties of in situ formed
            products  is  selective  laser  melting  (SLM).  The  process   nitride and oxide particles in the ODS steel produced by
            consists of layer-by-layer laser processing of powder   laser powder bed fusion in a nitrogen-rich atmosphere
            material according to a CAD model. SLM technology is   (with Y O  = 0.45 wt.%) was studied by Cakmak et al.
                                                                                                            26
                                                                     2
                                                                       3
            already widely used in areas such as aerospace, medicine,   The incorporation of nanosized Y O  reduces the length
                                                                                             3
                                                                                           2
            and turbine engineering. An important feature of the SLM   of typical for SLM as-built parts columnar grains (from
                                             8
                                        3
            process is the high cooling rates (10  – 10  K/s). 16  70 μm to 40 μm).  In addition to Y O , Al-O aluminum
                                                                              26
                                                                                               3
                                                                                             2
              A number of published studies demonstrate the    oxides, and Y-Al-O yttrium aluminum oxides were
            feasibility of producing ODS steels by  SLM.  A  study   observed in the microstructure. A  significant challenge
                                                 1,5
            suggests that optimization of the process parameters   in the production of ODS steel through in situ synthesis
            could lead to a density of more than 98%.  The results   during the SLM process lies in the inherent complexity of
                                               17
            also showed the possibility of obtaining a material with a   the technological workflow. This complexity necessitates
            uniform  distribution of  nanosized  oxides.  However,  the   precise monitoring and control of all process parameters
            Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025)                         2                         doi: 10.36922/MSAM025060004
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84