Page 22 - OR-1-3
P. 22

6. Limitations                                    Conflict of interest
            Although bibliometrics is a widely used method for   The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest
            assessing the impact of articles, our present study has several   regarding the publication of this paper.
            limitations. First, the data on bone/cartilage organoids were
            primarily sourced from the WOS database, which may  Author contributions
            have resulted in the omission of relevant publications from   Conceptualization: Aikang Li, Rongji Liang, Fuyang Cao
            other databases. Second, our study focused exclusively on   Data curation: Aikang Li, Rongji Liang, Weibei Sheng
            English-language articles, potentially excluding significant   Formal analysis: Weibei Sheng, Peng Liu
            research published in other languages. Finally, while older   Funding acquisition: Jianjing Lin
            research typically accumulates higher citation counts, such   Methodology: Jianjing Lin, Liang Gao
            articles may no longer reflect present trends or emerging   Project administration: Yanbin Peng
            hot topics in the field. Furthermore, high-quality papers   Supervision: Jianjing Lin, Xiaohao Wu
            may not receive adequate attention due to lower citation   Visualization: Aikang Li, Rongji Liang
            counts, creating a gap between bibliometric analysis and
            real-world impact.                                Writing - original draft: Aikang Li, Rongji Liang, Weibei
                                                                 Sheng, Weijin Guo, Peng Liu
            7. Conclusion                                     Writing - review & editing: Hui Zeng, Yanbin Peng, Jianjing Lin

            Our  bibliometric  study  of  bone  and  cartilage  organoids   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            reveals a growing interest in this field. The USA emerged
            as the most influential country in terms of research output   Not applicable.
            and publication quality. A  comprehensive analysis of   Consent for publication
            publications and citations identified  Bioactive Materials
            as the most influential journal. Jiacan Su from China and   Not applicable.
            Hans Clevers from the Netherlands were the most prolific
            and impactful authors, respectively. Annual publication   Availability of data
            data indicate a steady increase in publications since 2010,   The data and materials used in this study are available from
            peaking in 2023, suggesting that research in this area   the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
            will continue to expand. Across the analysis of journals
            and  keywords, we  identified  four  primary research  References
            directions and the trends they represent. Present research   1.   Zhang H, Wu S, Chen W, Hu Y, Geng Z, Su J. Bone/cartilage
            in bone/cartilage organoids is advancing in several key   targeted hydrogel: Strategies and applications. Bioact Mater.
            areas: stem cells and the microenvironment play a critical   2022;23:156-169.
            role in developing accurate tissue regeneration models;
            innovations in biomaterials are enhancing organoid growth      doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.10.028
            and functionality; organoids are enabling personalized   2.   Pigeolet M, Jayaram A, Park KB, Meara JG. Osteoarthritis in
            treatments for diseases, such as osteoarthritis in regenerative   2020 and beyond. Lancet. 2021;397(10279):1059-1060.
            medicine; and their application in disease modeling      doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00208-7
            and drug screening offers valuable platforms for testing
            therapies. Future research will likely focus on refining these   3.   Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis.
            models for clinical and pharmaceutical applications.  Lancet. 2019;393(10169):364-376.
                                                                 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3
            Acknowledgments
                                                              4.   Armiento  AR,  Alini  M,  Stoddart  MJ.  Articular
            None.                                                fibrocartilage - Why does hyaline cartilage fail to repair? Adv
                                                                 Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;146:289-305.
            Funding
                                                                 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.12.015
            This study was supported by the Guangdong Basic and   5.   Johnstone B, Alini M, Cucchiarini M, et al. Tissue engineering
            Applied Basic Research Foundation (project numbers:   for articular cartilage repair--the state of the art.  Eur Cell
            2023A1515220019, 2022A1515220056), the Sanming Project   Mater. 2013;25:248-267.
            of Medicine in Shenzhen (project number: SZSM202211019),
            the “Merro” Young Physician Innovation and Development      doi: 10.22203/ecm.v025a18
            Project (project number: GSKQNJJ-2023-004), and the   6.   Xue N, Ding X, Huang R,  et al. Bone tissue engineering
            Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (project     in the treatment of bone defects.  Pharmaceuticals (Basel).
            number: JCYJ20240813115833044).                      2022;15(7):879.


            Volume 1 Issue 3 (2025)                         13                                doi: 10.36922/or.8295
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27