Page 13 - TD-3-1
P. 13

Tumor Discovery                                                    Haplotype and LD of BRCA genes in GBM



            (PRAPi) to improve efficacy through synergistic activity   5. Conclusion
            and potentially sensitize naturally PARPi-resistant tumors
            to PARPi. Initial combinations of PARPi and chemotherapy   We build on our earlier finding that haplotype analysis
            were delayed by major overlapping hematologic toxicity,   among GBM patients can help predict patients who may
            but the latest combinations with lower toxicities and more   benefit  from TMZ treatment and that analyzing  BRCA1
            targeted approaches are currently undergoing assessments.    haplotypes may identify those who are at low risk of
                                                         28
                                                               developing cancer.
            In preclinical studies, the combination of TMZ with PRAPi
            has an enhanced cytotoxic effect, independent of HR,  as   Acknowledgments
                                                       29
            TMZ stimulates base damage, leading to the development
            of PARP-DNA complexes, which, in combination with   None.
            effective PARP-trapping agents, enhance cytotoxicity.
            This has encouraged research into trials assessing this   Funding
            combination over different tumor histologies such as   The study was supported by the Science and Technology
            GBM,  colorectal cancer,  and breast cancer.  In general,   Development Fund (STDF) through Capacity Building
                                31
                                                32
                 30
            the combination of TMZ and PARP inhibition was found   Grant Fund (CBG) (Grant No. 4940).
            to be well-tolerated, although efficacy was modest in most
            tumor subtypes. 33                                 Conflict of interest
              One  of  the  assumed haplotypes  includes  haplotype   The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
            [B], detected in homo- or heterozygous forms, which was
            associated with a familial history of breast cancer in the   Author contributions
            control individuals studied. This outcome was in agreement   Conceptualization: Mohamed K. Khalifa, Amira M Nageeb,
            with the study of Tuazon  et al.   Therefore, it will be   Menha Swellam
                                       34
            important to carry out a future prospective study to confirm   Formal  Analysis: Mohamed K. Khalifa MS, Amira  M
            this finding in a large group of Egyptian individuals.  Nageeb
              This paper is the first to report on the three identified   Investigation: Mohamed K. Khalifa LRE, Amira M Nageeb,
            haplotypes, termed haplotypes [C], [D], and [H], and all   Lobna R. Ezz El Arab
            were in heterozygous form. GBM patients with haplotypes   Methodology: Mohamed K. Khalifa, Amira M Nageeb,
            [C] and [D] responded to treatment with either CR or PR.   Menha Swellam
            Hence, it could be of great value to investigate the BRCA1   Writing – original draft: Mohamed K. Khalifa, Amira M
            haplotype among GBM patients before their treatment, as   Nageeb, Menha Swellam
            it was previously confirmed that BRCA1 protein expression   Writing – review & editing: All authors
            may as well predict GBM survival.  Moreover, the newly   Ethics approval and consent to participate
                                        35
            reported haplotype [H] was only detected in healthy
            individuals (n = 25), which may indicate that this type of   Ethical approval of the study was obtained from the
            haplotype reports a lack of risk for cancer predisposition.   Medical Ethical Committee of the National Research
            A prospective study is currently underway to confirm this   Center (ID#17111), Egypt, and all participants signed
            finding in a large Egyptian population.            informed consent.
              Although GBM haplotype analysis is of great importance   Consent for publication
            and the present study sheds light on this type of analysis in   Participants have  signed  their  informed  consent  for
            relation to GBM as one of the cancers worldwide, the small   publishing their data in this study.
            number of cases is one of the limitations of the study. This
            small number could be due to the fact that the incidence   Availability of data
            of cancer among Egyptians is not as high as breast or
            liver cancer. As this study is in the preliminary stage, the   Data used in this work are available from the corresponding
            enrollment of a large number of cases will be considered   author on reasonable request.
            in ongoing prospective research. Another limitation is   References
            the lack of some data for GBM patients, such as Isocitrate
            dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) and O6-methylguanine-DNA-    1.   Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C, et al. Epidemiologic
            methyltransferase (MGMT) status, so a comparison of   and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma.  Cancer
            haplotype variance regarding mutant IDH1 and MGMT     Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):1985-1996.
            methylation was not reported.                         doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         7                          https://doi.org/10.36922/td.1480
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18