Page 86 - AC-2-2

Arts & Communication Digital reconstitution of lost heritage

digitization technologies. In: Cultural Heritage Information: technical staff through LSTM and Bi-LSTM recurrent neural
Access and Management. London: Facet; 2015. p. 63-88. networks. Facilities. 2023;41(15/16):38-51.
doi: 10.29085/9781783300662.005 doi: 10.1108/F-07-2022-0093
36. Zhou M, Geng G, Wu Z. Digital Preservation Technology for 47. Moreno M, Prieto AJ, Ortiz R, et al. Preventive conservation
Cultural Heritage. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2012. and restoration monitoring of heritage buildings based on
fuzzy logic. Int J Archit Herit. 2023;17(7):1153-1170.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28099-3
doi: 10.1080/15583058.2021.2018520
37. Loscos C, Tecchia F, Frisoli A, et al. The Museum of Pure
Form: Touching Real Statues in an Immersive Virtual 48. Bordoni L, Ardissono L, Barceló JA, et al. The contribution
Museum. In VAST: The 5 International Symposium on of AI to enhance understanding of Cultural Heritage. Intell
th
Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage; Artif. 2013;7(2):101-112.
2004. p. 271-279. doi: 10.3233/IA-130052
doi: 10.2312/VAST/VAST04/271-279 49. Ranaldi L, Fallucchi F, Zanzotto FM. Dis-cover ai minds to
38. Bevan B, Dillon J. Broadening views of learning: Developing preserve human knowledge. Future Internet. 2021;14(1):10.
educators for the 21 century through an international doi: 10.3390/fi14010010
st
research partnership at the Exploratorium and King’s
College London. New Educ. 2010;6(3-4):167-180. 50. Girard G, Rafael-Patiño J, Truffet R, et al. Tractography passes
the test: Results from the diffusion-simulated connectivity
doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2010.10399599 (disco) challenge. NeuroImage. 2023;277:120231.
39. Gomez GA, Levine S. Grant, Ralph Wanger, and the Center doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120231
for the Art of East Asia, the University of Chicago. Voices.
2021;773:1060. 51. Howes A. Arts and Minds: How the Royal Society of Arts
Changed a Nation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2020.
40. Pesce D, Neirotti P, Paolucci E. When culture meets digital
platforms: Value creation and stakeholders’ alignment in big 52. Bowman M. A statistical analysis of the catalogues and
th
data use. Curr Issues Tour. 2019;22(15):1883-1903. criticism of the 19 -century Paris Fine Art Salon: The
emergence of titling in the French art world. Digit Scholarsh
doi: 10.1080/13683500.2019.1591354 Humanit. 2023;38(3):978-996.
41. Sandheinrich P, Hutson J. Haptic preservation of cultural doi: 10.1093/llc/fqac088
ephemera: An extended reality solution using stereoscopic
experience replication for victorian parlor culture. Metaverse 53. Zampronha E. Interdisciplinarity as a basis for the artistic
Basic Appl Res. 2023;2:48. and musical creation: An example connecting archeology
and music in a visual-sound installation. In: CIVAE 2021.
doi: 10.56294/mr202348 3 ed. Madrid, España: MusicoGuia; 2021. p. 189-193.
rd
42. Bevilacqua MG, Russo M, Giordano A, Spallone R. 3D 54. Till R. Sound archaeology: A study of the acoustics of three
Reconstruction, Digital Twinning, and Virtual Reality: world heritage sites, Spanish prehistoric painted caves,
Architectural Heritage Applications. In: 2022 IEEE Stonehenge, and paphos theatre. Acoustics. 2019;1(3):661-692.
Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces
Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). Piscataway: IEEE; 2022. doi: 10.3390/acoustics1030039
p. 92-96. 55. Debertolis P, Gullà D. New technologies of analysis in
archaeoacoustics. In: Archaeoacoustics II, The Archaeology of
43. Tan J, Leng J, Zeng X, Feng D, Yu P. Digital twin for Xiegong’s
architectural archaeological research: A case study of Sound, Publication of the 2015 Conference in Istanbul. Vol. 2.
Xuanluo Hall, Sichuan, China. Buildings. 2022;12(7):1053. The OTS Foundation; 2016. p. 33-50.
56. Neuhoff J. Ecological Psychoacoustics. Leiden: Brill; 2021.
doi: 10.3390/buildings12071053
57. Banari N. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for the
44. Kim J, Lee BK. A research on the possibility of restoring
cultural assets of artificial intelligence through the application Resource-scarce Cultural Heritage Domain: From Language
of artificial neural networks to roof tile (Wadang). J Korea and Image Processing to Multi-modality (Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Antwerp); 2022.
Soc Comput Inf. 2021;26(1):19-26.
58. Lang S, Ommer B. Transforming Information Into
45. Li J. Application of artificial intelligence in cultural heritage Knowledge: How Computational Methods Reshape Art
protection. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1881(3):032007.
History. Digit Humanit Q. 2021;15(3).
doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1881/3/032007
59. Galanos V. Expectations and Expertise in Artificial
46. D’Orazio M, Bernardini G, Di Giuseppe E. Predict the Intelligence: Specialist Views and Historical Perspectives on
priority of end-users’ maintenance requests and the required Conceptualisation, Promise, and Funding. Doctoral Thesis,

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2024) 12 doi: 10.36922/ac.2719