Page 245 - AJWEP-22-4

CEPI & ESG greenwashing: Exec. attention view

References the impact mechanism of executives’ environmental
attention on corporate green transformation: Evidence
1. Borck R, Schrauth P. Urban pollution: A global from the textual analysis of Chinese companies’
perspective. J Environ Econ Manage. 2024;126:103013. management discussion and analysis. Environ Sci Pollut
doi: 10.1016/J.JEEM.2024.103013 Res. 2023;30(31):76640-76659.
2. Xing Y, Xin QY. Management cost management and doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-27725-4
resource optimization of construction enterprises based 14. Aragón-Correa JA, Marcus A, Hurtado-Torres N. The
on ecological environment constraints. J Environ Public natural environmental strategies of international firms:
Health. 2022;2022:9884746. Old controversies and new evidence on performance and
doi: 10.1155/2022/9884746 disclosure. Acad Manag Perspect. 2016;30(1):24-39.
3. Delmas MA, Cuerel Burbano V. The drivers of doi: 10.5465/amp.2014.0043
greenwashing. Calif Manag Rev. 2011;54(1):64-87. 15. Eliwa Y, Aboud A, Saleh A. Board gender diversity and
doi: 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 ESG decoupling: Does religiosity matter? Bus Strateg
4. Brandão J, Cardoso FC, Garrett R. Why has the Brazilian Environ. 2023;32(7):4046-4067.
Cerrado been left behind by voluntary environmental doi: 10.1002/bse.3353
policies? Glob Environ Change. 2025;92:103005. 16. Zhao J, Wang X. Managerial myopia, technological
doi: 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2025.103005 innovation, and greenwashing: Moderating roles of
5. Lohocowdhury B, Giridhar D, Kumar Pal A, Mitra A. financing constraints and environmental uncertainty.
Environmental information policy in India feed pro- Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2025;218:124210.
environment industry operation: A case study of EIA report doi: 10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2025.124210
on proposed integrated steel complex site, Halakundi, 17. Qian S, Yang Z, Yang L, Zhang Y. Institutional investors’
Karnataka. Macromol Symp. 2023;407(1):2200078. green attention and corporate greenwashing: The
doi: 10.1002/MASY.202200078 effectiveness of external governance. Econ Anal Policy.
6. Canan S, Ceyhan V. Exploring the farm level opportunity 2025;86:2192-2206.
cost for protecting environment: Evidence from Turkey. doi: 10.1016/J.EAP.2025.05.048
J Agric Sci Technol. 2021;23(2):253-263. 18. Li H, Zhong Y. Digital transformation of enterprises and
7. Qin SS, Wang XC. Historical evolution of the communist greenwashing behavior: Evidence from China. Finance
party of China’s thought on ecological civilization system Res Lett. 2025;82:107585.
construction since reform and opening up. J Northeast doi: 10.1016/J.FRL.2025.107585
Univ (Soc Sci Ed). 2020;22(3):100-106. 19. Zhang ZB, Zheng XR, Lv QT, Meng XH. How institutional
doi: 10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.03.013 pressures influence corporate greenwashing strategies:
8. Liu NN, Lo CWH, Zhan X, Wang W. Campaign-style Moderating effects of campaign-style environmental
enforcement and regulatory compliance. Public Adm enforcement. J Environ Manag. 2025;373:123914.
Rev. 2015;75(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2024.123914
doi: 10.1111/puar.12285 20. Wang J. Assessing environmental protection Tax’s
9. Bo S. Centralization and regional development: Evidence impact on firms’ green practices: The mediating effect of
from a political hierarchy reform to create cities in China. green innovation and the moderating effect of executive
J Urban Econ. 2020;115(C):103182. green awareness. J Clean Prod. 2024;474:143593.
doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.06.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143593
10. Zhao NY, Lee CC. The impact of vertical environmental 21. Bai XY, Lyu C. Executive’s environmental protection
regulation mechanism on greenwashing. J Clean Prod. background and corporate green innovation: Evidence
2024;475:143637. from China. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4154.
doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.143637 doi: 10.3390/SU15054154
11. Jia K, Chen S. Could campaign-style enforcement 22. Lin J, Long C, Yi C. Has central environmental
improve environmental performance? Evidence from protection inspection improved air quality? Evidence
China’s central environmental protection inspection. from 291 Chinese cities. Environ Impact Assess Rev.
J Environ Manag. 2019;245:282-290. 2021;90:106621.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.114 doi: 10.1016/J.EIAR.2021.106621
12. Wang L, Le Q, Peng M, Zeng H, Kong L. Does central 23. Wang W, Mao C, Liu S. How does central environmental
environmental protection inspection improve corporate protection inspection drive the green transformation
environmental, social, and governance performance? of China’s heavy-polluting enterprises from an ESG
Evidence from China. Bus Strateg Environ. perspective? Front Environ Sci. 2024;12:1444671.
2022;32(6):2962-2984. doi: 10.3389/FENVS.2024.1444671
doi: 10.1002/BSE.3280 24. Wu R, Hu P. Does the “miracle drug” of environmental
13. Ding XW, Xu ZP, Petrovskaya MV, et al. Exploring governance really improve air quality? Evidence from

Volume 22 Issue 4 (2025) 237 doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025280219