Page 91 - AJWEP-22-4
P. 91

OpenDrift plastic waste in Thanh Hoa

                 Table 2. Observational data on the types, quantities, composition, size, and density of plastic waste present
                 in the Ma, Lach Bang, and Len rivers

                 Waste type                Lach Bang                      Len                         Ma
                                   Quantity (pieces)  Mass (kg)  Quantity (pieces)  Mass (kg)  Quantity (pieces)  Mass (kg)
                 Plastic bags           186            4.50          588          11.76         1,259         45.79
                 Strings                 45            0.97          118           2.03          387          2.28
                 Food bags               91            1.23          402           6.72          431          0.74
                 Single-use              72            0.87          187           0.98          236          0.97
                 plastics
                 Hard plastics           88            1.84          170           3.84          158          2.59
                 Styrofoam              132            0.40          185           0.46          506          0.93
                 Pineapple sacks         16            1.77           26           3.55          114          8.91
                 Raincoats               11            0.73           12           2.05          65           5.86
                 Fishing-tackle          41            0.50          133           2.13          353          3.73


                                                                     A                        B















                Figure 5. Average river flow in April, July, September,
                and December for the Ma River at Cam Thuy station   Figure 6. Comparison of marine plastic debris
                                                                    accumulation trends between OpenDrift model
                patterns. Combined with hydrodynamic forcing, the setup   results and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-derived
                enables accurate simulation of plastic waste trajectories   observations in the Nghi Son bay area. (A) Simulation
                and accumulation zones in the OpenDrift framework.  results for September 2024 from the OpenDrift
                                                                    model. (B) UAV-derived observations from imagery
                4. Results and discussion                           captured in September 2024.

                4.1. Model simulation and accuracy assessment          The results indicate  that  the modeled  trend of
                In this study, simulation  results from the OpenDrift   plastic  accumulation  aligns  reasonably  well  with
                model, run from June 2024 and forecasted through    observations  from  remote  sensing  data.  The  general
                September  2024,  were  compared  with  plastic  debris   pattern  shows  higher  concentrations  of  plastic  debris
                detection data extracted from unmanned aerial vehicle   in enclosed coastal areas, gradually decreasing toward
                (UAV) imagery captured in late September 2024 (project   offshore  regions.  This  suggests  that  the  OpenDrift
                code: ĐTĐL.CN.55/20). The comparison is illustrated   model provides a reasonably accurate simulation of the
                in Figure 6, where Figure 6A shows the simulated plastic   transport, dispersion, and accumulation of plastic debris
                debris density under the September 2024 scenario, and   in the Thanh Hoa marine area.
                Figure 6B presents plastic debris density derived from   Based on these simulation results, the model was
                UAV-based calculations. These datasets were overlaid   subsequently  applied  to  the  remaining  scenarios
                to  evaluate  the  accuracy  of  the  model  in  capturing   to  develop  risk  zoning  maps  for  plastic  debris
                plastic waste dispersion and accumulation patterns.  accumulation.





                Volume 22 Issue 4 (2025)                        83                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025170129
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96