Page 87 - AJWEP-22-5
P. 87

Evaluation of riverbank water suitability

                water intake sites is a critical prerequisite for ensuring   suitability index system that integrates water quantity,
                adequate  water quantity  and quality, as well as the   water quality, and geological risk, using expert scoring
                sustainable utilization of water resources. Developing   and  geographic  information  system  (GIS)-based
                a  standardized  and  scientifically  robust  evaluation   spatial  analysis. Several  studies have applied  the
                framework  for  site  suitability  not  only  enhances  the   analytic  hierarchy  process (AHP) to derive  indicator
                reliability  of  planning  and  decision-making  but  also   weights and conduct multi-criteria evaluations – such
                contributes  to  long-term  water  resource  management.   as Jafar et al.,  who conducted a comparative analysis
                                                                                 24
                Despite increasing  research  attention,  a universally   of  different  water  sources,  and  Yang  et  al.,  who
                                                                                                               25
                applicable  and  practically  implementable assessment   proposed a comprehensive  system with 28 indicators
                system is still lacking.                            to  assess  drinking  water  source  suitability  under
                  International research in this field began relatively   legal and environmental constraints. Muktadir et al.
                                                                                                                    26
                early, with a primary focus on hydrogeological processes,   further  developed  a  suitability  model  based  on  river
                pollutant  attenuation  mechanisms,  and  sustainable   morphological and hydrodynamic indicators.
                management  of river–aquifer interactions.  In terms   However, a critical review of the literature reveals
                                                      1-3
                of  methodology,  process-based  numerical  simulation   several research gaps. First, existing studies often adopt
                models  have  been  extensively  used  in  Europe  and   location-specific or empirical indicator systems, which
                North America to quantify surface water–groundwater   lack generalizability and standardized grading schemes
                exchange  processes.   These are often supplemented   applicable  to  broader  hydrogeological  contexts.
                                                                                                                    27
                                  4,5
                by  hydrochemical  and  microbiological  indicators  to   Second, while advanced  modeling techniques  are
                evaluate  the  safety  and  sustainability  of  riverbank   widely applied, there is a lack of integration between
                filtration.  Studies  in  major  river  basins  such  as  the   spatial analysis tools and multi-criteria decision-making
                Rhine and the Danube have identified key parameters   frameworks  in  site-level  evaluations.  Third,  few
                                                                                                        28
                influencing  water  intake  performance,  including   studies systematically consider the combined effects of
                riverbed  hydraulic  conductivity,  residence  time,  and   multiple  hydrological  and geological  parameters  in a
                redox conditions.  International organizations such   unified suitability index, which limits the applicability
                                6-8
                as the World Health Organization and the International   of results to real-world  planning  and engineering
                Hydrological Programme have also developed          implementation. 29
                comprehensive  assessment frameworks that integrate    To address these gaps, this study develops a
                quantitative  and qualitative  dimensions,  addressing   suitability evaluation system for riverside water intake
                issues of  climate  change  adaptation  and  emphasizing   sites  tailored  to  the  hydrogeological  characteristics
                the importance of long-term monitoring. 9-12        of the  Weining  Yellow River alluvial  plain.  The
                  Moreover, recent  trends  in  international  research   system integrates eight quantitative  indicators:  low-
                emphasize  interdisciplinary  integration,  combining   flow  river  discharge,  riverbed  sedimentation,  aquifer
                hydrological modeling, statistical analysis, and machine   hydraulic conductivity, aquifer thickness, presence of
                learning  techniques  (e.g.,  random  forest  and  artificial   continuous impermeable interlayers, river water quality,
                neural networks) to improve assessment accuracy     groundwater quality, and groundwater depth. Using
                and  predictive  capacity. 13-17   Risk-based  models,  such   the AHP to determine indicator weights and construct
                as  improved  versions  of  DRASTIC,  have  also  been   a  comprehensive  evaluation  model,  the  study further
                employed  to  evaluate  groundwater  vulnerability  in   employs  GIS-based  spatial  analysis  to  assess  intake
                intake  areas,  enhancing  the  scientific  basis  for  site   suitability across the study area. The aim is to provide
                selection and water safety assurance.               a  scientifically  grounded,  spatially  explicit  tool  for
                  In recent years, research on evaluation indicators and   optimizing the site selection of riverside water sources,
                methodologies for riverside water intake in China has   thereby contributing to more sustainable water resource
                expanded, especially in the context of the Yellow River,   development and management.
                which  features  unique  riverbed  sedimentation  and
                bank  morphology. 18-21   Various evaluation  frameworks   2. Hydrological and climatic overview of the
                have  been  proposed,  incorporating  hydrogeological,   study area
                hydrodynamic, and environmental risk indicators. For
                example, Cui et al.  examined the effect of sediment   2.1. Climatic and meteorological conditions
                                 22
                permeability  on  river  recharge  to  adjacent  aquifers,   The  study  area  encompasses  a  397  km  stretch  of  the
                while Zacharie et al.  developed an urban river intake   Yellow River, extending from southern Changtan
                                  23


                Volume 22 Issue 5 (2025)                        81                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025260208
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92