Page 152 - {PDF Title}
P. 152

Mahto, et al.

                different years may have introduced some discrepancies   Funding
                in the results.
                  The  groundwater  quality  assessment  of  the  Patna   None.
                district from 2004 to 2020 revealed significant spatial
                and temporal variations in physicochemical parameters.   Conflict of interest
                While  the  majority  of the  groundwater  samples  fell
                within the permissible  limits  for these parameters,   The authors declare they have no competing interests.
                water samples from certain locations exhibited elevated
                pH, EC, TH, alkalinity, chloride, nitrate, and other key   Author contributions
                contaminants, indicating localized contamination due to
                natural and anthropogenic influences. The Piper diagram   Conceptualization: Bandana Mahto, Premlata Singh
                analysis confirms that the dominant water type is Ca -  Formal analysis: Bandana Mahto, Baboo Rai
                                                              2+
                Mg -HCO , suggesting carbonate rock dissolution as   Investigation: Bandana Mahto
                   2+
                          −
                          3
                a major controlling factor, with some samples showing   Methodology: Bandana Mahto, Premlata Singh
                anthropogenic influences such as agricultural runoff and   Writing – original draft: Bandana Mahto
                industrial discharge.                               Writing – review & editing: All authors
                  With  the  WQI analysis  using  the  CCME method,
                approximately 76% of the water samples were classified   Availability of data
                as fair to excellent, whereas 24% fell into the marginal
                to poor categories, emphasizing the need for targeted   The data are available upon request to the corresponding
                monitoring  and  remediation  efforts  in  affected  areas.   author.
                On  the  other  hand,  the  heatmap  shows  improving
                groundwater  quality  since  2011, with  fewer  poor   References
                stations after 2012. By 2020, water from most stations
                                                                                                   rd
                was “fair” or better, though water from some, such as   1.  Raghunath HM. Ground Water. 3  ed. New Delhi: New
                Maranchi and Khaspur, remained persistently poor.       Age International (P) Limited, Publishers; 2007.
                  Spatial  mapping of  WQI in QGIS  using the       2.  Subramanya  K, Sharma  PJ.  Engineering  Hydrology.
                                                                         th
                IDW  interpolation  technique  provides  an  effective   6  ed. New York: McGraw Hill Education (India) Private
                                                                        Limited; 2024.
                visualization of groundwater quality, making it easier   3.  Carrard N, Foster T, Willetts J. Groundwater as a source
                to identify critical pollution zones and areas with good   of  drinking  water  in  Southeast  Asia  and  the  pacific:
                water quality. While QGIS proves to be an effective tool   A multi-country review of current reliance and resource
                for  groundwater  quality  assessment,  further  analysis   concerns. Water. 2019;11(8):1605.
                can be enhanced with the availability  of additional      doi: 10.3390/w11081605
                essential parameters.  The integration  of groundwater   4.  Alam  A,  Singh  A.  Groundwater  quality  evaluation
                quality mapping with analytical models aids in better   using statistical  approach and water quality index in
                understanding  solute  transport  behavior, thereby     Aurangabad,  Bihar.  RASAYAN J Chem.  2022;(Special
                supporting informed decision-making  for sustainable    Issue):180-188.
                groundwater resource management. Regular monitoring      doi: 10.31788/RJC.2022.1558191
                and proper treatment measures are crucial for ensuring   5.  Iddrisu  UF,  Armah  EK,  Tetteh  EK,  Amedorme  BS.
                safe and sustainable groundwater use in the region.     Assessing  groundwater  quality:  A  case  study
                  Groundwater quality in the Patna district is          in Ghana  Talensi district.  Water Pract Technol.
                impacted  by high EC,  TDS, hardness, alkalinity,       2023;18(9):2096-2113.
                                                                        doi: 10.2166/wpt.2023.135
                chloride, and nitrate, mainly due to agricultural runoff,     6.  Parveen S, Praveen B, Akram V. A systematic review on
                industrial discharge, and sewage infiltration. Effective   groundwater management: Opportunities and challenges.
                management of groundwater in Patna district requires    In: Shukla P, Singh P, Singh RM, editors. Environmental
                pollution control, advanced treatment methods, artificial   Processes and Management, Water Science  and
                recharge, and public awareness.                         Technology Library.  Vol.  120. Cham, Switzerland:
                                                                        Springer; 2023. p. 85-91.
                Acknowledgments                                         doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-20208-7_5
                                                                    7.  Abiriga  D,  Vestgarden  LS,  Klempe  H.  Groundwater
                None.                                                   contamination from a municipal landfill: Effect of age,



                Volume 22 Issue 1 (2025)                       146                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8142
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157