Page 131 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 131

Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution. Vol. 22, No. 2 (2025), pp. 125-139.
                doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025060032




                ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

                   Natural radioactivity and radiation risks of soils in Ali
                                          Al-Sharqi and Kumait, Iraq




                    Zahraa A. Ismail AL-Sudani * , Sawsan Sherif , and Mazin Mohammed                         3
                                                       1
                                                                              2
                                   1 Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Misan, Misan, Iraq
                          2 Department of Physics, College of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
                                      3 Radiation Protection Center, Ministry of Environment, Baghdad, Iraq
                               *Corresponding author: Zahraa A. Ismail AL-Sudani (zahraaismail@uomisan.edu.iq)


                  Received: February 3, 2025; 1st revised: March 10, 2025; 2nd revised: March 23, 2025; 3rd revised: March 30, 2025;
                                         Accepted: March 31, 2025; Published online: April 16, 2025




                     Abstract: Humans are subjected to natural radiation from external sources, such as radionuclides on Earth and
                     cosmic radiation, as well as internal radiation from radionuclides integrated into the body. Radionuclide intake
                     occurs mostly through the ingestion of food and water, as well as inhalation. The natural radioactivity in the
                     soils of Ali Al-Sharqi and Kumait, two cities in Misan province, Iraq, were measured. The soil samples were
                     collected from 47 Ali Al-Sharqi and Kumait areas, and levels of natural radionuclide were analyzed using a high-
                     purity germanium detector. The average activity concentrations of radionuclides, radium-226, thorium-232, and
                     potassium-40, were found to be 15.1 ± 2.5, 14.7 ± 2.4, and 180.8 ± 7.9 Bq/kg, respectively, for Ali Al-Sharqi. In
                     Kumait, the corresponding values were 13.6 ± 2.1, 17.2 ± 2.4, and 193.6 ± 8.6 Bq/kg, respectively. Radiation risk
                     parameters were also evaluated for both cities. The average radium equivalent activities for Ali Al-Sharqi and
                     Kumait were 50.2 Bq/kg and 53.2 Bq/kg, respectively. Internal and external hazard indices were 0.2 and 0.1, while
                     the gamma level index was 0.2 in both cities. In Ali Al-Sharqi, the absorbed gamma dose rates in the air (D , D ,
                                                                                                              out
                                                                                                           in
                     and D ) were 44.8, 23.5, and 68.3 nGy/h, the annual effective dose equivalents (AEDE , AEDE , and AEDE )
                                                                                                              tot
                          tot
                                                                                                   out
                                                                                            in
                     were 0.2, 0.02, and 0.2 mSv/y, the excess lifetime cancer risks (ELCR , ELCR , and ELCR ) were 0.8 × 10 ,
                                                                                                              −3
                                                                                                tot
                                                                              in
                                                                                     out
                     0.1 × 10 , and 0.9 × 10 , and the annual gonadal dose equivalent was 165.3 µSv/y. In Kumait, the corresponding
                                        −3
                           −3
                     values were 47.2, 24.8, and 72 nGy/h, 0.2, 0.03, and 0.3 mSv/y, 0.8 × 10 , 0.1 × 10 , and 0.9 × 10 , and 175 µSv/y,
                                                                             −3
                                                                                                  −3
                                                                                      −3
                     respectively. These findings indicate that the measured levels of radioactivity and health hazard parameters in both
                     cities were below the global average values reported by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of
                     Atomic Radiation. Therefore, the natural radioactivity in the soils of the investigated areas does not pose a health
                     risk to the public.
                     Keywords: Soil; Radionuclides; High-purity germanium; Dose rate; Ali Al-Sharqi.
                1. Introduction                                     and nuclear accidents.  Cosmic radiation, which comes
                                                                                        1
                                                                    from cosmic rays, varies in intensity based on latitude
                Radiation  in the environment  originates from two   and elevation. Natural terrestrial radiation in the Earth’s
                sources:  natural  and  artificial.  Natural  radiation   crust is primarily caused by the decay of uranium-238,
                includes both cosmic and terrestrial components, while   thorium-232  ( Th), and potassium-40  ( K). The
                                                                                  232
                                                                                                            40
                artificial radiation arises from nuclear weapon testing   concentration of natural radioactive materials in the soils
                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       125                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025060032
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136