Page 160 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 160

Reddy and Kumar

                PSO method in detail for optimal allocation and sizing   3. Research method
                of the UPFC. To ascertain the influence of the position
                and size of each UPFC unit, this study tested various   The four FACTS controllers proposed in this study were
                power system load conditions and evaluated the optimal   applied to AC power system networks. An ant colony
                way to set PSO parameters.                          optimization  (ACO)  approach  was  used  to  enhance
                  In  a  study  by  Guha  et  al.,  a metaheuristic   performance,  reduce oscillations,  and increase power
                                               18
                optimization  method  was presented  to enhance  the   system stability.
                stability  of the  power system  using a  supplementary
                damping controller  with the SSSC.  The method      3.1. FACTS controller
                utilized two control channels, phase, and magnitude, to   The term “FACTS” refers to a group of power electronics-
                enhance stability and resistance under various operating   based devices that enhance the controllability and
                conditions.  For the  optimization  process, the  authors   stability of power systems, as well as their capacity to
                employed a multi-objective approach based on weighted   transmit electricity. The purpose of using FACTS tools
                factor  summation.  Meanwhile,  Saidi   introduced  a   is  to  improve  the  initial  swing,  effectively  dampen
                                                  19
                hybrid control method for multi-area,  multi-machine   oscillations, and aid in system stabilization in the event
                power systems incorporating FACTS devices using non-  of  a  major  failure. 23,24   Examples  include  STATCOM,
                linear modeling. The method aimed to dampen interarea   SSSC, UPFC, and SVC. These devices offer an additional
                oscillations and maximize the utilization of the UPFC.   method of improving LFO by including supplemental
                Shehata  et  al.   utilized  PSO-adaptive  neuro-fuzzy   damping  controllers,  which  have  been  effectively
                              20
                inference system (ANFIS) models to estimate the PSS   utilized to increase the transient stability margin.
                parameters for single-machine infinite bus systems, both   The basic design of FACTS on a transmission line is
                with and without the UPFC. They applied the ANFIS   shown in Figure 1. The network status can be quickly
                model, combining fuzzy logic and neural networks, to   controlled  by  the  FACTs  controllers.  For  effective
                model the complexities of these systems. In addition,   management  of transmission line power, FACTS
                they  employed  the  PSO  algorithm,  a  metaheuristic   controllers can be used to precisely adjust the relative
                optimization technique, to find the optimal solution for   phase angle between two control areas. This facilitates
                the problem. In Khawaja et al.,  a hybrid optimization-  active  power exchange  across the transmission line
                                           21
                based SSSC controller  was developed  to address    and  helps  stabilize  frequency  variations.  By  reducing
                power oscillations in power transmission systems. The   oscillations in a disrupted system through carefully
                introduced  controller  was designed  to  optimize  the   regulated controller damping, transient stability may be
                parameters  of the  SSSC damping  controller  through   attained. The key benefit of incorporating FACTS into
                a  hybrid  differential  evolution-PSO  optimization   a power system is the enhancement of system stability
                algorithm. In Behzadpoor et al.,  developed a hybrid   and  reliability  by  regulating  the  system’s  power  flow
                                             22
                optimization technique called hybrid controlled series   and  providing  sufficient  power  oscillation  damping.
                compensator-pattern  search,  combining  the  chaotic   Therefore,  in the following section,  we describe  the
                SCA and pattern search for the coordinated design of   model of the aforementioned FACTS controllers.
                PSSs and SVC-based controllers.
                  Due to the erratic power supply from renewable    3.1.1. SVC model
                energy  sources,  effective  management  is  necessary   The SVC is a member of the FACTS family of shunt
                to maximize their potential. In this context, a hybrid   devices.  It comprises  an FC-TCR type, in which a
                energy storage system is required. Combining hybrid
                energy storage devices with renewable energy
                sources can improve power management in a direct
                current (DC) microgrid.  This study suggests the
                optimal hybrid energy storage solution for a DC
                microgrid using proportional-integral (PI) controllers
                to  efficiently  utilize  renewable  energy  sources.  The   Figure  1.  A  general block layout displaying the
                PSO method was used in this model to determine the   transmission FACTS device
                optimal PI controller. A 72 W DC microgrid system   Abbreviations: V : Receiving end voltage; V : Sending
                                                                                   R
                                                                                                            S
                was considered to verify the efficacy of the proposed   end voltage;  FACTS: Flexible  Alternating  Current
                optimal PI controller. 1                            Transmission System.


                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       154                                 doi: 10.36922/ajwep.8393
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165