Page 156 - AJWEP-v22i2
P. 156

Anser, et al.

                   doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117055                   doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2024.104096
                25.  Essaber S, Essayem A, Baccouche I. Catalyzing climate   36.  Wang J, Li W, Haq SU, Shahbaz P. Adoption of renewable
                   finance for climate actions in MENA countries: A holistic   energy technology on farms for sustainable and efficient
                   view  of  Egypt,  Morocco,  and  Tunisia.  In:  Digital   production: Exploring the role of entrepreneurial
                   Economy, Energy and Sustainability: Opportunities and   orientation, farmer perception and government policies.
                   Challenges.  Cham:  Springer  International  Publishers;   Sustainability. 2023;15(7):5611.
                   2023. p. 55-63.                                      doi: 10.3390/su15075611
                26.  Cao X, Bao Y, Li Y, Li J, Wu M. Unravelling the effects   37.  Kuhl  L,  Shinn  JE,  Arango-Quiroga  J,  Ahmed  I,
                   of  crop  blue,  green  and  grey  virtual  water  flows  on   Rahman MF. The liberal limits to transformation in the
                   regional agricultural water footprint and scarcity. Agric   Green Climate Fund. Clim Dev. 2024;16(9):826-837.
                   Water Manag. 2023;278:108165.                        doi: 10.1080/17565529.2023.2235318
                   doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108165                 38.  Lazaro LLB, Grangeia CS, Santos L, Giatti LL. What
                27.  Moursy   MAM,   ElFetyany   M,   Meleha  AMI,      is  green  finance,  after  all?-Exploring  definitions  and
                   El-Bialy MA. Productivity and profitability of modern   their  implications  under  the  Brazilian  biofuel  policy
                   irrigation  methods through  the  application  of  on-farm   (RenovaBio). J Clim Finance. 2023;2:100009.
                   drip irrigation on some crops in the Northern Nile Delta      doi: 10.1016/j.jclimf.2023.100009
                   of Egypt. Alex Eng J. 2023;62:349-356.           39.  Arellano  M,  Bond  S.  Some  tests  of  specification
                   doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.063                       for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence  and an
                28.  Fang K, He J, Liu Q, et al. Water footprint of nations   application  to  employment  equations.  Rev  Econ  Stud.
                   amplified  by  scarcity  in  the  belt  and  road  initiative.   1991;58(2):277-297.
                   Heliyon. 2023;9(1):e12957.                           doi: 10.2307/2297968
                   doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12957               40.  Blundell  R,  Bond  S.  Initial  conditions  and  moment
                29.  Barati AA, Pour MD, Sardooei MA. Water crisis in Iran:   restrictions  in dynamic  panel data models.  J  Econom.
                   A  system  dynamics  approach  on  water,  energy,  food,   1998;87(1):115-143.
                   land,  and  climate  (WEFLC)  nexus.  Sci  Total  Environ.      doi: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
                   2023;882:163549.                                 41.  World  Bank.  World  Development  Indicators  (WDI).
                   doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163549                 Washington, DC; 2022. Available from: https://databank.
                30.  Beker  BA,  Kansal  ML.  Complexities  of  the  urban   worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
                   drinking  water  systems  in  Ethiopia  and  possible   [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 05].
                   interventions  for  sustainability.  Environ Dev  Sustain.   42.  World  Bank.  World  Governance  Indicators  (WGI).
                   2024;26(2):4629-4659.                                Washington, DC; 2022. Available from: https://databank.
                   doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02901-7                      worldbank.org/source/worldwide-governance-indicators
                31.  Gharib AA, Blumberg J, Manning DT, Goemans C, Arabi   [Last accessed on 2024 Sep 05].
                   M. Assessment of vulnerability to water shortage in semi-  43.  Khan A, Khan B, Khan G. Dynamic effects of energy
                   arid  river  basins:  The  value  of  demand  reduction  and   aid  in  energy  transition  under  the  moderating  role  of
                   storage capacity. Sci Total Environ. 2023;871:161964.  the  government’s  regulatory  quality.  Sustain  Futures.
                   doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161964                 2024;8:100247.
                32.  Tsakiris  GP,  Loucks  DP.  Adaptive  water  resources      doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100247
                   management  under climate  change:  An introduction.   44.  Yang  C,  Menz  C,  Fraga  H,  et al. Assessing  the
                   Water Resour Manag. 2023;37:2221-2233.               grapevine crop water stress indicator over the flowering-
                   doi: 10.1007/s11269-023-03518-9                      veraison phase and the  potential  yield  loss rate  in
                33.  Grzegorzek  M,  Wartalska  K,  Kaźmierczak  B.     important European wine regions. Agric Water Manag.
                   Review  of  water  treatment  methods  with  a  focus  on   2022;261:107349.
                   energy consumption.  Int Commun Heat Mass Transf.      doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107349
                   2023;143:106674.                                 45.  Zhang CY, Oki T. Water pricing reform for sustainable
                   doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106674        water  resources  management  in  China’s  agricultural
                34.  Hassan Q, Al-Hitmi M, Tabar VS, Zuhair A, Salman HM,   sector. Agric Water Manag. 2023;275:108045.
                   Jaszczur  M.  Middle  East  energy  consumption  and      doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108045
                   potential  renewable  sources: An  overview.  Clean  Eng   46.  Dziedzic  M,  Gomes  PR,  Angilella  M,  et al.
                   Technol. 2023;12:100599.                             International  circular  economy  strategies  and  their
                   doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2023.100599                      impacts on agricultural water use. Clean Eng Technol.
                35.  Abu-Rayash A, Dincer I. Development of an integrated   2022;8:100504.
                   model for environmentally and economically sustainable      doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2022.100504
                   and smart cities.  Sustain Energy Technol Assessments.   47.  Tehrani  MM,  Akhtari  M,  Kasaeian  A,  Rad  MAV,
                   2024;73:104096.                                      Toopshekan  A,  Motlagh  MS.  Techno-economic



                Volume 22 Issue 2 (2025)                       150                           doi: 10.36922/AJWEP025090057
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161