Page 73 - AN-1-1
P. 73

Advanced Neurology                                         Cortical thickness and regional homogeneity in CSVD



            involved in the regulation of executive function, emotional   with CI. The higher local coherence of activity could be a
            behavior, conflict, feedback, errors, and pain , increased   sign of maladaptive brain activity and suggests functional
                                                [36]
            ACG activation had been reported to be associated with   deterioration in CSVD patients with CI . In any case,
                                                                                                [14]
            the retrieval of episodic memory . ACG infarction was   decreased cortical thickness and normal ReHo in the
                                       [38]
            also found to result in working memory dysfunction , in   right ACG may be of value in predicting the onset of CI in
                                                      [39]
            accordance with our finding that ACG regulated memory   CSVD patients.
            processes. However, correlation analyses revealed that
            higher ReHo values in the right ACG were associated   Importantly, although the CSVD without CI group
            with  poorer  memory  function, including both  short-  retained normal global function, participants in this
            term memory and long-term memory, in CSVD patients   group exhibited impaired visuospatial function. In the
                                                               present study, CI was defined according to performance
                                                               in the MoCA test. The MoCA test has high sensitivity
            Table 5. Cortical thicknesses of the bilateral insula, right
            ACG, right cuneus, and right MTG among the CSVD‑CI   for CI and has been commonly used to detect CI in the
            group, CSVD‑no‑CI group, and NC group              previous studies [40,41] . However, our finding suggests that
                                                               visuospatial function  may have higher sensitivity  for
             Brain     Side   CSVD‑CI   CSVD‑no‑CI   NC        CI than the MoCA test in CSVD patients. Importantly,
             region            group      group      group     we also found that early impaired visuospatial function
            Insula     Left   2.32±0.19  2.42±0.19  2.54±0.18  including visuospatial structure and visuospatial memory
            Insula     Right  2.20±0.17  2.28±0.16  2.40±0.14  was associated with decreased cortical thickness of the
            ACG        Right  2.37±0.17  2.50±0.16  2.53±0.17  right MTG in CSVD patients. Visuospatial function is an
            Cuneus     Right  1.76±0.18  1.87±0.17  1.93±0.15  ability to comprehend visual representations and spatial
            MTG        Right  2.17±0.30  2.28±0.29  2.48±0.27  relationships between objects and domains, including
            Cortical thickness is reported in millimeters. Cortical thicknesses of   storage, retrieval, and transformation of spatial or visual
                                                                    [42]
            brain regions are shown as mean±s.d.               stimuli . Poor visuospatial attention had been found in
            Table 6. ReHo values of ROIs in the CSVD‑CI group, CSVD‑no‑CI group, and NC group

             Brain   Side  CSVD‑CI   CSVD‑no‑CI   NC group  P‑value  a  CSVD‑CI group   CSVD‑CI group versus   CSVD‑no‑CI group
             region        group      group                    versus NC group  b  CSVD‑no‑CI group b  versus NC group b
            Insula  Left  -0.30±0.33  -0.40±0.24  -0.22±0.34  0.005  1.000         0.061            0.004
            Insula  Right  -0.24±0.30  -0.26±0.25  -0.13±0.30  0.024  0.153        1.000            0.028
            ACG    Right  0.07±0.30  0.15±0.27  0.09±0.27  0.266   1.000           0.333            0.752
            Cuneus  Right  0.57±0.40  0.57±0.32  0.61±0.35  0.669  1.000           1.000            1.000
            MTG    Right  -0.85±0.29  -0.84±0.31  -0.78±0.29  0.580  1.000         1.000            0.934
            General linear model adjusted for age and education was used for ReHo analysis in SPSS among the CSVD-CI group, CSVD-no-CI group, and NC
            group. Bonferroni correction was used for post hoc multiple comparison corrections in general linear model. ReHo values of ROIs were shown as
            mean±s.d.  : P values of GLM analysis among the CSVD-CI group, CSVD-no-CI group, and NC group,  : P values of post hoc multiple comparisons of
                   a
                                                                              b
            ReHo values among the CSVD-CI group, CSVD-no-CI group, and NC group
            Table 7. Significant correlations between MRI parameters and cognitive scales
             Group             Brain region   Cognitive scale  MRI parameter    Correlation coefficient  P‑value
            CSVD-CI group      Right ACG      AVLTIR          ReHo value             −0.369            0.002
            CSVD-CI group      Right ACG      AVLTSTDR        ReHo value             −0.356            0.003
            CSVD-CI group      Right ACG      AVLTLTDR        ReHo value             −0.372            0.002
            CSVD-CI group      Right ACG      DSF             Cortical thickness      0.339            0.001
            CSVD-no-CI group   Right MTG      BNT             Cortical thickness      0.327            0.015
            CSVD-no-CI group   Right MTG      VRC             Cortical thickness      0.353            0.008
            CSVD-no-CI group   Right MTG      VRIR            Cortical thickness      0.398            0.002
            CSVD-no-CI group   Right MTG      VRDR            Cortical thickness      0.305            0.022
            Partial correlation analysis was used to explore the association between the MRI parameters and cognitive scale scores, with age and education as
            covariates


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2022)                         8                        https://doi.org/10.36922/an.v1i1.48
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78