Page 136 - AN-3-3

Advanced Neurology Delayed occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy

2. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, et al. Comparison prospective cohort study on symptomatic cerebrovascular
of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial occlusive disease showing mild hemodynamic compromise
stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(13):1305-1316. [Japanese extracranial-intracranial bypass trial (JET)-2
study]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(6):460-468.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043033
3. Wong LK. Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0424
J Stroke. 2006;1(3):158-159. 12. Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, et al. Effect of
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2006.00045.x a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy
on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial
4. EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extracranial- stenosis: The VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA.
intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic 2015;313(12):1240-1248.
stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. N Engl J
Med. 1985;313(19):1191-1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1693
doi: 10.1056/nejm198511073131904 13. Gao P, Wang T, Wang D, et al. Effect of stenting plus
medical therapy vs medical therapy alone on risk of stroke
5. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP, et al. Stenting versus and death in patients with symptomatic intracranial
aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. stenosis: The CASSISS randomized clinical trial. JAMA.
N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):993-1003. 2022;328(6):534-542.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335 doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.12000
6. Turk AS, Spiotta A, Frei D, et al. Initial clinical experience 14. Yeo JYP, Yau CE, Ong NY, et al. Comparing the Impact of
with the ADAPT technique: A direct aspiration first pass stenting vs. medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis:
technique for stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. A systematic review and one-stage and two-stage meta-
2014;6(3):231-237. analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Neuroradiol.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010713 2024;34:379-390.
7. Powers WJ, Clarke WR, Grubb RL Jr., Videen TO, Adams HP Jr., doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01370-3
Derdeyn CP. Extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for 15. Enomoto Y, Takagi T, Matsubara H, et al. Delayed stenosis in
stroke prevention in hemodynamic cerebral ischemia: The the intracranial vessels following endovascular treatment for
Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study randomized trial. JAMA. acute stroke. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(12):1814-1819.
2011;306(18):1983-1992.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.08.014
doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1610
16. Labeyrie MA, Civelli V, Reiner P, et al. Prevalence and
8. Yamauchi H, Fukuyama H, Nagahama Y, et al. Evidence treatment of spontaneous intracranial artery dissections in
of misery perfusion and risk for recurrent stroke in major patients with acute stroke due to intracranial large vessel
cerebral arterial occlusive diseases from PET. J Neurol occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10(8):761-764.
Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61(1):18-25.
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013763
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.18
17. Teng D, Pannell JS, Rennert RC, et al. Endothelial trauma
9. Grubb RL Jr., Derdeyn CP, Fritsch SM, et al. Importance from mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: In
of hemodynamic factors in the prognosis of symptomatic vitro live-cell platform with animal validation. Stroke.
carotid occlusion. JAMA. 1998;280(12):1055-1060.
2015;46(4):1099-1106.
doi: 10.1001/jama.280.12.1055
doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.007494
10. Yamauchi H, Higashi T, Kagawa S, et al. Is misery perfusion 18. Eugène F, Gauvrit JY, Ferré JC, et al. One-year MR
still a predictor of stroke in symptomatic major cerebral angiographic and clinical follow-up after intracranial
artery disease? Brain. 2012;135(Pt 8):2515-2526.
mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever device.
doi: 10.1093/brain/aws131 AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(1):126-132.
11. Kataoka H, Miyamoto S, Ogasawara K, et al. Results of doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4071

Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024) 5 doi: 10.36922/an.3332