Page 66 - AN-4-1
P. 66
Advanced Neurology Cognitive assessment using performance-based tests
Table 3. (Continued)
Assessment Study QuADS Description Sample size Mean age (SD) Cognitive Approach/model
relevant Rating and TBI of the TBI domains
iv
to the TBI (x/39) subgroup subgroup assessed
population
Hotel task (HT) 51 51 11 Simulated hotel work N=10 32.1 (11.1) Executive No approach/
tasks: preparing bills TBI=9 functioning model
for guests, sorting skills, including documented
coins, finding details planning,
on a menu, sorting organization,
name tags, and self-monitoring,
proofreading and flexibility
Naturalistic action test 52 19 Four subtasks: N=100 35.7 (12.7) Comprehension Developed as a
(NAT) 20 preparing toast, TBI=25 of instructions, simpler version
making coffee, planning, of the multiple
wrapping a present, problem-solving, errands test for
40
and packing a attention, and use in a hospital;
child’s school bag; initiation. based on Luria’s
standardized cueing multiple object
and scoring; objects tests (MOTs),
53
required for the tests modified to
are placed amongst become the
distractor items; multi-level action
scoring based on test, which later
54
steps completed and became NAT
errors made
Observed tasks of 56 22 Three IADL N=140 52.5 (17.4) Everyday Based on a
daily living-revised tasks: answering TBI=40 problem-solving hierarchical
(OTDL-R) 55 medication model of everyday
questions, using cognition 57
a phone to source
information, and
paying a bill by
check; provides
a summary score
of performance
of everyday
problem-solving
Perceive, recall, plan, and 58 15 Observation of a N=16 45.2 (14.6) Information the underlying
perform system of task PADL or IADL task TBI=7 processing conceptual model
analysis (PRPP) 23 chosen by clinician components is the information
and patient; scores required for processing model
patient’s ability, task task, perception, from learning
breakdown, and recall, response new tasks in the
influence of the planning, and workplace 59
environment performance;
these four areas
of cognitive
processing are
interrelated in
this assessment
The Rabideau kitchen 61 18 Patient asked to N=34 30.3 (6.4) Functional Based on Lezak’s
62
evaluation-revised prepare a meal and TBI=34 sequencing; research (i.e., if
(RKE-R) 60 hot drink (i.e., a cold test designed to an individual
sandwich with two evaluate client can synthesize
fillings and a hot status over time their skills to
drink); cueing and complete a task)
level of assistance and Trombly’s
were scored scoring of meal
preparation
skills 63
(Cont’d...)
Volume 4 Issue 1 (2025) 60 doi: 10.36922/an.4508
