Page 53 - DP-1-1
P. 53
Design+ Multimodality in art teacher education in China
studies. Our critical discussion suggests that the existing 6. Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach
empirical evidence base on this phenomenon in China to Contemporary Communication. United Kingdom:
is very limited and needs to grow in both quantity and Routledge; 2010.
quality to support education reform in the years to come. 7. Kress G, Van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of
Visual Design. United Kingdom: Routledge; 2006.
Acknowledgments
8. Yang J. Chinese contemporary art teachers’ professional
None. development in the 20 and 21 centuries within the
st
th
multicultural framework. Herit Sci. 2022;10(56):2-16.
Funding
doi: 10.1186/s40494-022-00692-8
None.
9. Saris B. Review of engagement with creativity and creative
Conflict of interest design processes for Visual Communication Design (VCD)
learning in China. Int J Art Des Educ. 2019;39(2):306-318.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
doi: 10.1111/jade.12262
Author contributions 10. Cope B, Kalantzis M. The things you do to know:
An introduction to thepedagogy of multiliteracies.
Conceptualization: Sze Seau Jill Lee In: A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design.
Writing – original draft: All authors United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 1-36.
Writing – review & editing: Sze Seau Jill Lee, Li Ling Siew
11. Bateman J, Wildfeuer J, Hiippala T. Multimodality:
Ethics approval and consent to participate Foundations, Research and Analysis - A Problem-Oriented
Introduction. Germany: De Gruyter; 2017.
Not applicable.
12. Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMI. An Introduction to
rd
Consent for publication Functional Grammar. 3 ed. London: Arnold; 2004.
13. New London Group. A pedagogy of multiliteracies:
Not applicable.
Designing social futures. In: Cope B, Kalantzis M, editors.
Availability of data Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social
Futures. United Kingdom: Routledge; 1996. p. 9-38.
Not applicable.
14. Van Leeuwen T. Multimodal literacy. Metaphor. 2017;4:17-23.
References doi: 10.3316/aeipt.219392
1. Yang Y. Development and current status of art education 15. Lim FV. A design-based research approach to the teaching
in China: From policy to practice. In: Chemi T, Wang L and learning of multiliteracies. Asia Pac Educ Res.
Du X, editors. Arts-Based Education: China and Its 2022;32:641-653.
Intersection with the World. Vol. 2. Netherlands: Brill; doi: 10.1007/s40299-022-00683-0
2019. p. 142-163.
16. Lim FV, Toh W, Nguyen TTH. Multimodality in the English
doi: 10.1163/9789004399488_009
language classroom: A systematic review of literature.
2. Cope B, Kalantzis M. Pedagogies for digital learning: From Linguist Educ. 2022;69:1-30.
transpositional grammar to the literacies of education. In: doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2022.101048
Multimodal Literacies Across Digital Learning Contexts.
United Kingdom: Routledge; 2021. p. 34-54. 17. Stein P. Multimodal Pedagogies in Diverse Classrooms:
Representation, Rights and Resources. United Kingdom:
3. Lim FV, Cope B, Kalantzis M. A metalanguage for learning: Routledge; 2008.
Rebalancing the cognitive with the socio-material. Front
Commun. 2022;7:1-15. 18. Michelson K, Lee JF, Abdennebi M. Textual thinking as
evidenced through think-alouds: Designing meanings
doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.830613 in interpreting authentic L2 web texts. Lang Teach Res.
4. Bezemer J, Kress G. Multimodality, Learning and 2022;1-30.
Communication: A Social Semiotic Frame. United Kingdom: doi: 10.1177/13621688221096782
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2016.
19. Paesani K, Allen HW. Teacher development and
5. Jewitt C, Bezemer J, O’Halloran K. Introducing Multimodality. multiliteracies pedagogy: Challenges and opportunities
United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis; 2016.
for postsecondary language programs. Second Lang Res.
doi: 10.4324/9781315638027 2020;1(1):124-138.
Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 9 doi: 10.36922/dp.4554

