Page 49 - DP-2-3

Design+ Speculative and participatory stakeholder mapping

doi: 10.1007/s13412-022-00761-1 22. Argandoña A. Stakeholder theory and value creation. SSRN
J. 2011;922:15.
10. Payne A, Ballantyne D, Christopher M. A stakeholder
approach to relationship marketing strategy. The doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1947317
development and use of the “six markets” model. Eur J Mark. 23. Bridoux F, Stoelhorst J. Stakeholder theory, strategy, and
2005;39(7-8):855-871.
organization: Past, present and future. Strateg Organ.
doi: 10.1108/03090560510601806 2022;20(4):797-809.
11. Rivera‐Camino J. Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: doi: 10.1177/14761270221127628
A stakeholder perspective. Eur J Mark. 2007;41(11- 24. Jones TM. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of
12):1328-1358. ethics and economics. Acad Manage Rev. 1995;20(2):404.
doi: 10.1108/03090560710821206 doi: 10.2307/258852
12. Olander S, Landin A. Evaluation of stakeholder influence 25. Donaldson T, Preston LE. The stakeholder theory of the
in the implementation of construction projects. Int J Project corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad
Manage. 2005;23(4):321-328. Manage Rev. 1995;20(1):65-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002 doi: 10.2307/258887
13. Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. A stakeholder analysis. Health 26. Scrich VM, Elliff C, De Andrade MM, Grilli NM, Turra
Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):338-345. A. Stakeholder analysis as a strategic tool in framing
doi: 10.1093/heapol/15.3.338 collaborative governance arenas for marine litter monitoring.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2024;198:115799.
14. Freeman RE, Reed DL. Stockholders and stakeholders:
A new perspective on corporate governance. Cal Manage doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115799
Rev. 1983;25(3):88-106. 27. Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, et al. Who’s in and why?
doi: 10.2307/41165018 A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural
resource management. J Environ Manage. 2009;90(5):1933-
15. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of 1949.
stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the
principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manage Rev. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
1997;22(4):853-886. 28. Cross N, ed. Proceedings of the Design Research Society
doi: 10.2307/259247 International Conference, 1971: Design Participation.
London: Design Research Society; 1972. Available from:
16. Marie S. Stakeholder profile and stakeholder mapping of https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/conference-volumes/1
SMEs. Littera Scripta. 2016;1:123-139.
29. Bødker S. Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts
17. Clifton D, Amran A. The stakeholder approach: and resources in systems development. Hum Comput
A sustainability perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2011;98(1):121-136. Interact. 1996;11(3):215-236.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0538-6 doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1103-2
18. Harrison JS, Wicks AC. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm 30. Bødker S, Dindler C, Iversen OS, Smith RC. What is
performance. Bus Ethics Q. 2013;23(1):97-124. participatory design? In: Participatory Design. Synthesis
doi: 10.5840/beq20132314 Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. New York:
Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 5-13.
19. Freudenreich B, Lüdeke-Freund F, Schaltegger S.
A stakeholder theory perspective on business models: Value doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-02235-7-2
creation for sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 2020;166(1):3-18. 31. Sanders EBN, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new
doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04112-z landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5-18.
doi: 10.1080/15710880701875068
20. Freeman RE. Managing for stakeholders: trade-offs or value
creation. J Bus Ethics. 2010;96(1):7-9. 32. Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V. Co-creation experiences:
The next practice in value creation. J Interact Mark.
doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0935-5 2004;18(3):5-14.
21. Breuer H, Lüdeke-Freund F. Values-based network doi: 10.1002/dir.20015
and business model innovation. Int J Innov Manage. 33. Buchanan R. Design ethics. In: Mitcham C, editor.
2017;21(03):1750028.
Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics. Vol 2. United
doi: 10.1142/S1363919617500281 States: Thomson Gale; 2005. p. 504-510.

Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025) 13 doi: 10.36922/DP025060011