Page 48 - DP-2-3
P. 48

Design+                                                      Speculative and participatory stakeholder mapping



            methods and future-oriented speculations is the pillar of the   Investigation: Davide M. Parrilli
            project methodology. They are the first milestones of this   Methodology: Davide M. Parrilli
            research. However, limitations exist due to the use of just one   Project administration: Davide M. Parrilli
            case study, and further research on the implementation of   Writing – original draft: Davide M. Parrilli
            the methodology is needed. Additional test cases with more   Writing – review & editing: All authors
            scenarios in each (in private and government organizations
            and in different geographical and cultural contexts) are   Ethics approval and consent to participate
            planned to validate the milestones presented in this paper.  Consent to participate is not required because the research
              The research also identifies another area requiring   uses data that have been fully anonymized.
            further investigation. Speculative design provides
            interesting methodologies and tools that can be used   Consent for publication
            in several projects and scenarios.  However, the present   Consent  for  publication  is  not  required  because  the
            practice of speculative design makes it unfit to truly play   research uses data that have been fully anonymized.
            a role in promoting change within organizations, both
            due to its exclusive focus on the relationship between   Availability of data
            technology and society and its radical, almost sectarian,   Data used in the research can be made available to readers
            approach to design. The design need not uphold existing   on request, subject to privacy restrictions.
            power structures, but its primary function should not be
            to dismantle them either. Taking a pragmatic, designer   References
            approach to speculative design can enhance its value and   1.   Rittel HW, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of
            make it a more relevant tool for driving change.
                                                                  planning. Policy Sci. 1973;4(2):155-169.
              Finally, future investigations will explore a particular area      doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
            related to participatory stakeholder identification. Research
            in the field of biases and noise in predictions suggests that,   2.   Papanek V.  Design for the Real  World. United  Kingdom:
            once stakeholders are identified, forecasting their impact in   Thames and Hudson; 2019.
            terms of value can be better done individually by different   3.   Ceschin F, Gaziulusoy İ. Design for Sustainability: A Multi-
            team  members  rather  than together,  for example, in  a   Level Framework from Products to Socio-Technical Systems.
            workshop. When people make predictions together, there is   England: Routledge; 2020.
            a real risk that one (or some) member of the team strongly   4.   Bijl-Brouwer MVD, Malcolm B. Systemic design principles
            influence the other, potentially leading to inaccurate   in social innovation: A study of expert practices and design
            predictions and conformism-driven consensus.  In other   rationales. J Design Econ Innovat. 2020;6(3):386-407.
                                                  56
            words, when a team has to make predictions and the      doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2020.06.001
            stakes are high, participatory design methods show serious
            limitations. However, the Stakeholder Mapping Cone   5.   Tromp  N,  Hekkert  P.  Designing for Society: Products and
            is designed to be used speculatively both in groups and   Services for a Better World.  London:  Bloomsbury  Visual
                                                                  Arts; 2019.
            individually, thus potentially overcoming the limitations of
            collective predictions.                            6.   Aligica PD. Institutional and stakeholder mapping:
                                                                  Frameworks  for  policy analysis  and  institutional  change.
            Acknowledgments                                       Public Organiz Rev. 2006;6(1):79-90.

            None.                                                 doi: 10.1007/s11115-006-6833-0
                                                               7.   Styk K, Bogacz P. A  method for stakeholder mapping in
            Funding                                               connection with the  implementation  of  a  development
            None.                                                 project. Energies. 2022;15(4):1592.
                                                                  doi: 10.3390/en15041592
            Conflict of interest
                                                               8.   Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.
            The authors declare they have no competing interests.  United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
            Author contributions                               9.  Catzín-Tamayo  A,  Frausto-Martínez  O,  Arroyo-
                                                                  Arcos L. Stakeholder mapping and promotion of sustainable
            Conceptualization: Davide M. Parrilli                 development goals in local management. J Environ Stud Sci.
            Formal analysis: Davide M. Parrilli                   2022;12(3):611-626.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         12                           doi: 10.36922/DP025060011
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53