Page 68 - EER-2-1

Explora: Environment
and Resource Sustainable urban park design

Sustainable urban
park

1. Management 4. Aesthetics and 5. Environmental 6. Activity
quality 2. Life quality 3. Social quality furnishing quality quality quality

Participation in Use for Suitability for Sufficient Energy efficient
management relaxation children hardware lighting systems Bike paths
element

Preservation of Use for Suitability for
existing parks entertainment the elderly Usability of Native plants Kiosks
furnitures

Contribution to Suitability for Water
life quality disabled people Aesthetic of conservation Event field
furnitures

Being clean and Harvesting
Accessibility well-maintained Playgrounds rainwater
for children
Waste
collection
Good lighting system
Sports fields
Recycling
program
Usability of
walking and
jogging paths Conservation
of biodiversity

Aesthetic of
walking and
jogging paths

Soft landscape
suitability

Hard landscape
suitability

Figure 2. Sustainable urban park model
fields, free green activity areas, width, flooring quality, and harmony with the surrounding elements, revealed that
location within the park and surroundings. The evaluation, Altinpark received the highest evaluation with an average
made on a scale of 1 – 3, ranked Altinpark ahead of Botanik of 2.20. In the same study, Altinpark received an average
68
Park (1.70) but behind Gençlik Park (1.92) with an average value of 2.53, close to Botanik Park (2.60), when plant
of 1.88. Moreover, evaluation of the furniture based on its elements were examined according to their dimensions,
functionality, adequacy of distribution within the park, such as suitability of species selection, adequacy of

Volume 2 Issue 1 (2025) 12 doi: 10.36922/eer.5839