Page 106 - EJMO-9-2

Eurasian Journal of Medicine and
Oncology
Dietary links between dairy, meat, and egg intake and pancreatic cancer risk

pancreatic cancer risk: A pooled analysis of 14 cohort pancreatic cancer among African American Women. Cancer
studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(6):1106-1115. Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(9):1775-1783.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu019 doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0048
27. Oncina-Cánovas A, Torres-Collado L, García-de-la-Hera M, 37. Sun Y, He X, Sun Y. Red and processed meat and pancreatic
et al. Association between dairy products consumption cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1249407.
and esophageal, stomach, and pancreatic cancers in the doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1249407
PANESOES multi case-control study. Cancers (Basel).
2024;16:4151. 38. Kim Y. The association between red, processed and white
meat consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: A meta-
doi: 10.3390/cancers16244151 analysis of prospective cohort studies. Cancer Causes
28. Zhang K, Dai H, Liang W, Deng Z. Fermented dairy foods Control. 2023;34:569-581.
intake and risk of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(9):2099-2108. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01698-8
doi: 10.1002/ijc.31959 39. Huang BZ, Wang S, Bogumil D, et al. Red meat consumption,
29. Haddadin JSY. Kinetic studies and sensorial analysis of lactic cooking mutagens, NAT1/2 genotypes and pancreatic
acid bacteri isolated from white cheese made from sheep cancer risk in two ethnically diverse prospective cohorts. Int
raw milk. PJN. 2005;4(2):78-84. J Cancer. 2021;149: 811-819.
30. Haddad MA, Al-Qudah MM, Abu-Romman SM, et al. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33598
Development of traditional jordanian low sodium dairy 40. Paluszkiewicz P, Smolińska K, Dębińska I, Turski WA.
products. J Agric Sci. 2017;9(1):223-230. Main dietary compounds and pancreatic cancer risk. The
31. Oliveira RBA, Margalho LP, Nascimen JS, et al. Processed quantitative analysis of case-control and cohort studies.
scontamination by spore-forming bacteria: A review of Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36(1):60-67.
sources, routes, fate during processing and control. Trends doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.004
Food Sci Technol. 2016;57:11-19.
41. Larsson SC, Wolk A. Red and processed meat consumption
32. Thiébaut ACM, Jiao L, Silverman DT, et al. Dietary fatty and risk of pancreatic cancer: Meta-analysis of prospective
acids and pancreatic cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and studies. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(3):603-607.
health study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(14):1001-1011.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.585
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp168
42. Rohrmann S, Linseisen J, Nöthlings U, et al. Meat and fish
33. Azeem K, Horáková D, Tomaskova H, et al. Evaluation of consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer: Results from
dietary habits in the study of pancreatic cancer. Klin Onkol. the European prospective investigation into cancer and
2016;29(3):196-203. nutrition. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(3):617-624.
doi: 10.14735/amko2016196 doi: 10.1002/ijc.27637
34. Taunk P, Hecht E, Stolzenberg-Solomon R. Are meat and 43. Larsson SC, Håkanson N, Permert J, Wolk A. Meat, fish, poultry
heme iron intake associated with pancreatic cancer? Results and egg consumption in relation to risk of pancreatic cancer:
from the NIH-AARP diet and health cohort. Int J Cancer. A prospective study. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(11):2866-2870.
2016;138(9):2172-2189.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.21732
doi: 10.1002/ijc.29964
44. Jiang W, Wang M, Jiang HZ, Chen GC, Hua YF. Meta-
35. Polesel J, Talamini R, Negri E, et al. Dietary habits and risk analysis of fish consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer
of pancreatic cancer: An Italian case- control study. Cancer in 13 prospective studies with 1.8 million participants. PLoS
Causes Control. 2010;21(4):493-500. One. 2019;14(9):e0222139.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9480-2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222139
36. Petrick JL, Castro-Webb N, Gerlovin H, et al. A prospective 45. Tenny S, Kerndt CC, Hoffman MR. Case control studies. In:
analysis of intake of red and processed meat in relation to StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

Volume 9 Issue 2 (2025) 98 doi: 10.36922/ejmo.6637