Page 101 - EJMO-9-3
P. 101

Eurasian Journal of
            Medicine and Oncology                                           Novel senescence-based melanoma risk model



            as protective factors. Among these, baculoviral IAP repeat-  each gene to the overall risk score is proportional to its
            containing 3, C-C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CCL8),   prognostic significance. The training set samples were
            protein kinase C beta, suppressor of cytokine signaling   classified into high-risk and low-risk groups based on
            1, TNF superfamily member 14, and zeta chain of T cell   the median risk scores. This stratification revealed a clear
            receptor-associated protein kinase 70 were markedly linked   dichotomy in patient outcomes, such as individuals in the
            to infiltration of activated CD4  memory T cells, while   low-risk group showed remarkably better overall survival
                                      +
            C1QA, CCL4, and CCL5 were strongly associated with   compared to those in the high-risk group (p<0.001)
            CD8  T cells infiltration (Figure 2D and E). In addition,   (Figure  3B). This finding indicates that the risk model
                +
            CXC motif chemokine ligand 1, CXC motif  chemokine   effectively stratifies patients according to their likelihood of
            ligand 5, and CXC motif chemokine receptor 2, acting as   survival, suggesting its potential utility in clinical practice
            risk factors (HR > 1), were significantly associated with   for predicting patient outcomes. To further validate the
            neutrophil infiltration, which in agreement with previous   prognostic independence of the risk score, a multivariate
            studies.  Moreover, activation scores of key immune   Cox regression analysis was performed, adjusting for key
                  34
            hallmark pathways, including interferon (IFNs) response,   clinical variables including age, gender, tumor stage (T
            inflammatory response, and interleukin-6/Janus  kinase/   stage), nodal involvement (N stage), and distant metastasis
            signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (IL-6/   (M stage). The results confirmed that the risk score showed
            JAK/STAT3) signaling, were markedly elevated in Cluster   a significant association with patient survival, suggesting its
            2 compared to Cluster 1 (Figure 2F). These pathways play   potential as an independent predictor of patient outcomes
            crucial roles in regulating immune responses, enhancing   (Figure 3C). Notably, age, advanced T4 stage, and N3 stage
            anti-tumor immunity, and modulating the TME. The   were also identified as independent risk factors for poor
            heightened activation of these immune-related pathways   prognosis, aligning with established clinical knowledge
            in Cluster 2 suggests a more robust immune surveillance   and further validating the model’s alignment with real-
            mechanism, which may contribute to improved tumor   world  patient  outcomes.  Intriguingly,  an  examination
            control and more favorable clinical outcomes. Collectively,   of risk scores across the previously identified molecular
            these findings provide strong evidence that the    subtypes revealed that patients in cluster 2 – characterized
            immunoactivated subtype is closely associated with better   by prolonged survival and an immunoactivated phenotype
            prognosis, further highlighting the potential significance   – consistently exhibited lower risk scores compared to those
            of immune modulation in melanoma progression and   in cluster 1 (Figure 3D). The model’s ability to integrate
            treatment response.                                molecular and clinical data into a unified risk score offers
                                                               a promising tool for risk stratification in melanoma, with
            3.3. Construction of risk model based on prognostic   potential applications in guiding immunotherapy decisions
            senescence-related genes                           and identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from

            After performing Lasso regression, a total of 25 genes   more intensive therapeutic approaches.
            were selected from the pool of prognostic senescence-
            related genes to develop the risk model with multivariate   3.4. Validation of the risk model in the validation set
            Cox regression (Figure 3A). Among these, ten genes were   and external datasets
            identified as risk factors, with forkhead box M1 emerging   To confirm the accuracy of the  risk model, risk scores
            as the most significant contributor to poor prognosis.   were measured for the validation set samples. According
            Conversely, fifteen genes functioned as protective factors,   to  the median risk score, samples  were  categorized into
            with inhibitor of NF-κB kinase regulatory subunit gamma   high-risk and low-risk groups. The low-risk group showed
            and CCL8 showing the strongest associations with favorable   significantly better survival compared to  the  high-risk
            survival outcomes. Notably, CCL8 exhibited significantly   group, indicating that the risk model accurately stratifies
            higher expression levels in Cluster 2, suggesting its potential   patients based on their prognostic likelihood (p=0.0018,
            role in shaping the immunoactivated TME. Previous   Figure 4A). Next, differences in immune profiles between
            correlation analysis revealed that CCL8 expression showed   the two groups were evaluated using CIBERSORT analysis,
            a positive correlation to the infiltration of activated CD4    followed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The low-risk
                                                          +
            memory T cells, reinforcing its possible involvement   group exhibited significantly elevated levels of activated
            in enhancing anti-tumor immune responses. For each   NK cells, anti-tumor M1 macrophages, and CD8  T
                                                                                                          +
            sample, the risk score was determined as the weighted sum   cells, consistent with the immune profile observed in the
            of the selected gene expression, multiplying each gene’s   training set (Figure  4B), indicating an immunoactivated
            expression by its corresponding regression coefficient,   subtype. To further assess the robustness of the risk model,
            which was obtained from the multivariate Cox regression   an additional SKCM dataset (GSE65904) was obtained
            model. This approach ensures that the contribution of   from the GEO database.  After filtering out probes
                                                                                     17
            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025)                         93                              doi: 10.36922/ejmo.8574
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106